Shree Shivam Attires Private Limited Shree Shivam Shopping Mall,Station Road, Durg, Chhattisgarh Station Road, Durg, Chhattisgarh v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax Circle- 2 (1), Bungalowno
High Court
15 Dec 2023 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · cghccisdb
Parties
Shree Shivam Attires Private Limited Shree Shivam Shopping Mall,Station Road, Durg, Chhattisgarh Station Road, Durg, Chhattisgarh v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax Circle- 2 (1), Bungalowno
Date of order
15 Dec 2023
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In Shree Shivam Attires Private Limited Shree Shivam Shopping Mall,Station Road, Durg, Chhattisgarh Station Road, Durg, Chhattisgarh v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax Circle- 2 (1), Bungalowno, the High Court (2023) allowed the appeal under Section 143, Section 154 of the Income-tax Act. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: With the aforesaid observation, the appeal stands disposed of.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
TAXC No. 202 of 2023
Shree Shivam Attires Private Limited Shree Shivam Shopping Mall,Station Road, Durg, Chhattisgarh Station Road, Durg, Chhattisgarh
---- Petitioner
Versus
The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax Circle- 2 (1), BungalowNo. 32/32, 32 Bungalows, Bhilai, District- Durg- CG Pin- 491006 No. 32/32, 32 Bungalows, Bhilai, District- Durg- CG Pin- 491006
---- Respondent
For Appellant : Shri S. Rajeshwara Rao, Advocate For Respondent: Shri Amit Chaudhari, Advocate For Respondent: Shri Amit Chaudhari, Advocate
Hon'ble Shri Justice Goutam Bhaduri &
Hon'ble Shri Justice Deepak Kumar Tiwari
Judgment on Board
Per Goutam Bhaduri, J
15/12/2023
Heard.
1.Learned counsel for the appellant would submit that pursuant to the return filed on 25/10/2018 summary assessment was carried out under Section 143 (1) of the Income Tax Act on 18/05/2019, which amenates from the audit objection that an amount of Rs.25,81,110/- deduction was not allowed. He would further submit that the entire amount would touch upon the contribution towards the EPF and ESIC. He would further submit that the application for rectification though was filed under the nomenclature which is embodied in Section 154 of the Act return filed on 25/10/2018 summary assessment was carried out under Section 143 (1) of the Income Tax Act on 18/05/2019, which amenates from the audit objection that an amount of Rs.25,81,110/- deduction was not allowed. He would further submit that the entire amount would touch upon the contribution towards the EPF and ESIC. He would further submit that the application for rectification though was filed under the nomenclature which is embodied in Section 154 of the Act
but the issue touches upon the merit as certain dis-allowance which was made was otherwise available and when the issue traveled up to the Tax Appellate Tribunal, the Tribunal instead of deciding the case on merits has simply adjudicated the issue on the ground that the rectification application was not maintainable. He would further submit that it is a settled proposition that the assessee cannot be a taxed on the amount on which the tax is not legally imposable, therefore, apparently it would be a mistake which also touches upon the merit. He placed his reliance in the matter of Akbar Mohammad Prop. M/s Mohd. Rafique Associates Versus the ACIT, CPC, Banglore {2022 (2) TMI 479-ITAT Jodhpur}.
Learned counsel for the respondent department would submit that he has no objection if the case is remitted back to the appellate tribunal to adjudicate on merits.
After going through the order it appears that though the application was filed under the nomenclature of rectification but if certain amount on which the tax is imposed is not legally recoverable then it also touches upon the merit. Consequently, in order to advance the cause on merits about the issue, we set aside the order of the ITAT dated 07/07/2023 and remit back the same to the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal to adjudicate the same on merits.
4.
With the aforesaid observation, the appeal stands disposed of.
Sd/- Sd/-
(Goutam Bhaduri) (Deepak Kumar Tiwari)
Judge Judge
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.