Shreyas Foundation, Ahmedabad� v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax
High Court
29 Nov 1996 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · gujarathc
Parties
Shreyas Foundation, Ahmedabad� v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
29 Nov 1996
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In Shreyas Foundation, Ahmedabad� v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (1996) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
INCOME TAX REFERENCE NO. 353 OF 1983
Shreyas Foundation, Ahmedabad�.. Applicant
Versus
The Commissioner of Income Tax,
Gujarat-I, Ahmedabad��.. Respondent
Date of Decision : 29th November 1996
For Approval and Signature
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.K. ABICHANDANI
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BALIA
1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed
to see the judgement?
2. To be referred to the Reporter or not?
3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy
of Judgement?
4. Whether this case involves a substantial question
of law as to the interpretation of the
Constitution of India, 1950 or any order made
thereunder?
5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge?
Mr. D.A. Mehta with Mr. R.K.Patel and B.D. Karia for
applicant
Mr Bharat J. Shelat instructed by Mr. Manish R. Bhatt
for respondent
Coram : R.K. Abichandani and Rajesh Balia, JJ
29th November 1996
Oral Judgement (Per Rajesh Balia, J)
1.�The Tribunal has stated the case and referred the questions of law arising out of its appellate orders in ITA 2135 and 2136/Ahd/80 relating to assessment year
questions of law arising out of its appellate orders in ITA 2135 and 2136/Ahd/80 relating to assessment year 1975-76 and 1976-77 at the instance of the assessee.
2. Since at the time of hearing learned counsel for the
assessee at whose instance this reference has been made
does not want to press for answering the questions, we
decline to answer the same. Reference returned
unanswered.
***
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.