Shri Abdul Rehman, Advocate On Behalf Of Shri Sanjay v. M/S Sanwaria Agro Oil Ltd.) On 23.07.2018
High Court
04 Sep 2018 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · mphc_db_jbp
Parties
Shri Abdul Rehman, Advocate On Behalf Of Shri Sanjay v. M/S Sanwaria Agro Oil Ltd.) On 23.07.2018
Date of order
04 Sep 2018
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Shri Abdul Rehman, Advocate On Behalf Of Shri Sanjay v. M/S Sanwaria Agro Oil Ltd.) On 23.07.2018, the High Court (2018) dismissed the appeal.
Decision: I n view of the aforesaid, we find that the objectionraised by Shri Agrawal, counsel for the respondent hassubstance and, therefore, in terms of the circular dated 11[th]July, 2018, the present appeal stands dismissed as withdrawnkeeping the question of law open as and when it arises inappropriate m...
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
The High Court Of Madhya PradeshITA-31-2013
( THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXVs MOHD. ATIQUE)
[04][-][09][-][2018]Jabalpur, Dated :
Shri Abdul Rehman, Advocate on behalf of Shri Sanjay
Lal, Advocate for the appellant.
Shri Mukesh Agrawal, Advocate for the respondent.
Shri Mukesh Agrawal, counsel for the respondent raisedan objection regarding maintainability of the appeal in view ofthe circular of the Government of India, Ministry of Finance,Department of Revenue, Central Board of Direct Taxes, NewDelhi dated 11[th] July, 2018 as well as the order passed by thisCourt in I.T.A. No.212/2017 (Asstt. Commissioner of IncomeTax Vs. M/s Sanwaria Agro Oil Ltd.) on 23.07.2018.
I n view of the aforesaid, we find that the objectionraised by Shri Agrawal, counsel for the respondent hassubstance and, therefore, in terms of the circular dated 11[th]July, 2018, the present appeal stands dismissed as withdrawnkeeping the question of law open as and when it arises inappropriate manner.
Needless to say that we have not expressed any opinionon the merit of the case or otherwise of the legal issues raisedby the appellant in the present appeal.
(S.K. SETH)(SMT. ANJULI PALO)JUDGEJUDGE
@shish
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue