Shri A.k. Yadav v. Commissioner Of Income Tax - Xxv, Mumbai
High Court
05 Apr 2011 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Shri A.k. Yadav v. Commissioner Of Income Tax - Xxv, Mumbai
Date of order
05 Apr 2011
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Shri A.k. Yadav v. Commissioner Of Income Tax - Xxv, Mumbai, the High Court (2011) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: 4.The appeal is accordingly dismissed with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.6877 OF 2010
Shri A.K. Yadav..Appellant.
Versus
Commissioner of Income Tax - XXV, Mumbai..Respondent.
Mr.D.H. Nadkarni with Mr.V.N. Ansurkar i/by Legal Solutions for the appellant.Ms.Padma Divakar for the respondent.
CORAM : J.P. Devadhar & Smt.R.S. Dalvi, JJ.
P.C. :
DATE : 5[th] April, 2011.
1.The appellant is aggrieved by the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal dated 2-7-2010, whereby the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) dated 18-01-2008 has been set aside and the matter is remanded back to the file of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) for decision afresh.
2.The grievance of the appellant is that the matter was already remanded back once on the earlier occasion by order dated 15-09-2006 and, therefore, it is contended that in the light of the judgment of the Delhi High
Court in the case of Commissioner of Income Tax V/s. Imperial Cables (P.)
Limited reported in (2007) 159 Taxman 328 (Delhi), the Tribunal was not justified in remanding the matter once again.
3.Perusal of the order of the Tribunal shows that when the matter was remanded to the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) by the earlier order and when the matter was taken up for hearing, neither the Officers of the department nor the assessee were present and the order was passed exparte. In these circumstances, the decision of the Tribunal to restore the matter back to the file of the Assessing Officer for denovo hearing cannot be faulted.
4.The appeal is accordingly dismissed with no order as to costs.
(Smt.R.S. Dalvi, J.)
(J.P. Devadhar, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.