In Shri Apurva Diwanji v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Taxcircle 7(1), Mumbai, the High Court (2008) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Appeal is allowed to be withdrawn and dismissed as such.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONINCOME TAX APPEAL NO.529 OF 2002
Shri Apurva Diwanji
: Appellant
v/s
Deputy Commissioner of Income TaxCircle 7(1), Mumbai
: Respondent
Mr. A.K. Jasani i/b Mr. S.N. Inamdar Advocate forAppellant
Mr. P.S. Sahadevan Advocate for respondent
Coram : Dr. S. RadhakrishnanS.J. Kathawalla, JJ.
Date : 21.8.2008
P.C.
.
Heard the learned counsel for the appellant
and the learned counsel for the respondent. Learnedcounsel for the appellant seeks leave to withdraw theappeal. Appeal is allowed to be withdrawn and
dismissed as such. Permissible court fees be refunded
to the appellant as per rules.
(S.J. Kathawalla,J.)
(Dr. S.Radhakrishnan,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue