Shri. Ashok Munilal Jain,2. Shri. Mahaveer Kumar v. Deputy Director Of Income Tax (Investigations)Unit 1 (1), Room
High Court
18 Jul 2017 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
Shri. Ashok Munilal Jain,2. Shri. Mahaveer Kumar v. Deputy Director Of Income Tax (Investigations)Unit 1 (1), Room
Date of order
18 Jul 2017
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Shri. Ashok Munilal Jain,2. Shri. Mahaveer Kumar v. Deputy Director Of Income Tax (Investigations)Unit 1 (1), Room, the High Court (2017) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: In view of the endorsement made by the learned counsel forthe petitioner, this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 18.07.2017
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE T.S.SIVAGNANAM
W.P.No.2004 of 2017andW.M.P.Nos.2602, 2603,4044 and 4045 of 2017
1. Shri. Ashok Munilal Jain,2. Shri. Mahaveer Kumar .. Petitioners
Vs.
Deputy Director of Income Tax (Investigations)Unit 1 (1), Room No. 209, 2[nd] Floor,No.46, New Income Tax Building (Investigation Wing),M.G.Road, Nungambakkam, Chennai – 600 034... Respondent
Prayer: Writ petition filed under Article 226 of theConstitution of India praying for issuance of Writ of Mandamusor any appropriate writ, order or direction, directing therespondent, to forthwith sell the gold bullion seized from thepremises of the petitioners and to credit the seized cash andthe sale proceeds of the seized gold bullion on account ofpetitioner no.1 towards tax, surcharge and penalty payable bythe petitioner no.1 to credit 25% of the undisclosed incometowards deposit in the PMGKY (Pradhan Mantri Garib KalyanDeposit) Deposit scheme for a lock-in period of 4 years, and toreturn the remaining balance amount to the Petitioner no.1 inaccordance with the said Scheme upon filing of a declarationprescribed under the said scheme subject, of course, tofulfilment by the petitioners, of all the stipulations andincidents of the said scheme and the procedure prescribed inthis regard.
For Petitioner : Mr.G.Derrick Sam G. Vijayabalan
For Respondent : Mr.A.P.Srinivas Senior Panel counsel
The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission ofthis Court to withdraw this Writ Petition. He has also made anendorsement to that effect.
In view of the endorsement made by the learned counsel forthe petitioner, this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Nocosts. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petitions areClosed.
Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS VI) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrarsli/pbnToDeputy Director of Income Tax (Investigations)Unit 1 (1), Room No. 209, 2[nd] Floor,No.46, New Income Tax Building (Investigation Wing),M.G.Road, Nungambakkam, Chennai – 600 034.
+1cc to Mr.A.P.Srinivas, Advocate, S.R.No.50200+1cc to Mr.Hari Radhakrishnan, Advocate, S.R.No.50842
W.P.No.2004 of 2017 and W.M.P.Nos.2602,2603,4044 and 4045 of 2017AR(CS VI)CS/03/08/17
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.