Shri Ashwini Kuamr Agarwal v. Commissioner Of Income Tax Jaipur-Ii, Jaipur Ncr Building, Statuecircle, Jaipur
High Court
13 Mar 2024 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · jaipur
Parties
Shri Ashwini Kuamr Agarwal v. Commissioner Of Income Tax Jaipur-Ii, Jaipur Ncr Building, Statuecircle, Jaipur
Date of order
13 Mar 2024
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Shri Ashwini Kuamr Agarwal v. Commissioner Of Income Tax Jaipur-Ii, Jaipur Ncr Building, Statuecircle, Jaipur, the High Court (2024) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Issue: Learned counsel for the appellant is directed to seek instructions as to whether cause of action survives with the efflux of time as assessment year involved in the case is 2006-07.
Decision: 3.The petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 8760/2009
Shri Ashwini Kuamr Agarwal Proprietor M/s Assam Industries B-305,Road No.16, VKI Area, Jaipur
----Petitioner
Versus
1. Commissioner Of Income Tax Jaipur-II, Jaipur NCR Building, StatueCircle, Jaipur.
2. Income Tax Officer, Ward 4(2), Jaipur NCR Building, Statue Circle,Jaipur.
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. C.M. Sharma For Respondent(s):
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BHUWAN GOYALOrder
13/03/2024
1.On 12.02.2024 following order was passed:-
“Learned counsel – Mr. Arnav Singh, on behalf of learned counsel-Mr.Sandeep Pathak, appears for the respondents.
Learned counsel for the appellant is directed to seek instructions as to whether cause of action survives with the efflux of time as assessment year involved in the case is 2006-07.
Put up on 23[rd] February, 2024.”
2.Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in spite of
best efforts, he is not getting any instructions from the petitionerto enable him to pursue the petition.
3.The petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
4.The petitioner shall be at liberty to move an application forrevival of the writ petition, if cause of action survives.
(BHUWAN GOYAL),J(AVNEESH JHINGAN),J
Anu/Chandan/42
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.