Shri Deepak C. Kotian v. The Income-Tax Officer, 9(2) & Anr
High Court
01 Oct 2004 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Shri Deepak C. Kotian v. The Income-Tax Officer, 9(2) & Anr
Date of order
01 Oct 2004
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Shri Deepak C. Kotian v. The Income-Tax Officer, 9(2) & Anr, the High Court (2004) decided the matter.
Decision: Appeal is dismissed in limine.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORIGINAL SIDE
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 840 OF 2002
Shri Deepak C. Kotian
vs.
1.The Income-tax Officer,9(2) & Anr.9(2) & Anr.
Appellant
Respondents
Mr.Andhyarujina with Mr.V.S.Hadade and Mr.M.Subramanianfor the appellant.
Mr.R.V.Desai with Mr.Vijay Kantharia i/b. Mr.P.Kapurfor the respondents.
CORAM: R. M. LODHA &J.P.DEVADHAR,JJ.
DATED: 1st October 2004
P.C.
Heard Mr.Andhyarujina, the senior counsel for the
appellant.2. The assessee was found to be in possession of thecash of Rs.13,50,850, four sovereigns valuingRs.17,336/- and two gold chains valuing Rs.10,000/-. Itwas not established that anyone else other than theassessee was the owner. In view thereof, the finding ofthe Tribunal that assessee is found to be owner of theaforesaid property cannot be faulted.
3. No substantial question of law arises.
4. Appeal is dismissed in limine.
(R.M. LODHA,J.)
(J.P. DEVADHAR,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue