Shri Deepak v. The Chairman, Cbdt, Department Of Revenue & Ors
High Court
26 Feb 2014 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · testcase
Parties
Shri Deepak v. The Chairman, Cbdt, Department Of Revenue & Ors
Date of order
26 Feb 2014
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In Shri Deepak v. The Chairman, Cbdt, Department Of Revenue & Ors, the High Court (2014) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYNAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR.
CAW NO. 2291/2013 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 4146 OF 2013
(Shri Deepak s/o Deoraoji Sthul vs. The Chairman, CBDT, Department of Revenue & Ors.)
__________________________________________________________________________
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram,appearances, Court's orders of directionsand Registrar's Orders.
Court's or Judge's orders.
CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI &Z.A. HAQ, JJ.FEBRUARY 26, 2014.
Heard Shri Kshirsagar, learned counsel for the applicant.
On oral request, the application is treated as one for amendment. Accordingly, the documents are allowed to be annexed with writ petition as Annexures (VI) and (VII). The necessary amendment be carried within two weeks from today.
CAW NO. 479 OF 2014
Shri Kshirsagar, learned counsel states that in view of the subsequent events, the matter needs to be heard on merits and hence Civil Application may be disposed of.
We accordingly dispose of civil application.
Issue fresh notice of amended petition to the respondents pointing out that the matter may be heard finally at the convenience of the Court and they shall be proceeded ex-parte if they do not appear. Notice is made returnable on 22[nd] April 2014.
JUDGE
JUDGE
*GS.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.