Case LawHigh Court › Shri Gautham Chand Jainno v. Assistant C...

Shri Gautham Chand Jainno v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Taxcentral Circle 1(1), Chennai 34

High Court 10 Feb 2025 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
Shri Gautham Chand Jainno v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Taxcentral Circle 1(1), Chennai 34
Date of order
10 Feb 2025
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Allowed

Case summary

In Shri Gautham Chand Jainno v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Taxcentral Circle 1(1), Chennai 34, the High Court (2025) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: 4.In view of the above, the above miscellaneous petition is allowed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

CMP NO. 28601 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 10-02-2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE S. S. SUNDAR AND THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE C. SARAVANAN CMP NO. 28601 of 2024 in TCA SR.164617 of 2024 Shri Gautham Chand JainNo.13, 3rd Street, Balgota Villa, Sambiar Street, Gandhi Salai Seven Wells, Sowcarpet, Chennai- 600001 Vs Assistant Commissioner Of Income TaxCentral Circle 1(1), Chennai 34. Appellant(s) Respondent(s) For Appellant(s): Mr.Ashok Pathy ForM/s.Pass Associates For Respondent(s):M/s.Karthik Ranganathan, Sr Standing CounselAos Filed Reg Sole Respondent - ServedSole Respondent - Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax Central Circle 1(1), Chennai 34.------ V/r. M/s. R.Karthik-ms/1636/2004 ORDER (Order of the Court was made by the Hon'ble S.S.Sundar J.) Mr. M.Karthick, learned standing counsel accepts notice for the respondent. 2.The above petition is filed to condone the delay of 184 days in filing the above Appeal. 3.This Court is fully convinced with the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition. Learned standing counsel appearing for the petitioner has given sufficient reasons for the delay and the delay is explained to the satisfaction of this Court. The learned counsel appearing for the respondent has not raised any serious objection to allow this petition. 4.In view of the above, the above miscellaneous petition is allowed. The delay of 184 days in filing the above appeal is condoned. Registry is directed to number the appeal and list the same before this Court, if the same is otherwise in order. (S.S.SUNDAR, J.) (C.SARAVANAN, J.) 10-02-2025 kas
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan