Case Law › High Court › Shri Geeta Sacks Private Limited v. Assi...

Shri Geeta Sacks Private Limited v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle 4(1)(1), Ahmedabad

High Court 18 Oct 2022 In favour of: Revenue

Forum / Bench

High Court · gujarathc

Parties

Date of order

18 Oct 2022

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

Case summary

In Shri Geeta Sacks Private Limited v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle 4(1)(1), Ahmedabad, the High Court (2022) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 20668 of 2022 ==============================================================SHRI GEETA SACKS PRIVATE LIMITED VersusASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE 4(1)(1),AHMEDABAD =============================================================== Appearance: MR SUDHIR M MEHTA(2058) for the Petitioner(s) No. 1MS SHAILEE S MEHTA(5873) for the Petitioner(s) No. 1 for the Respondent(s) No. 1 =============================================================== CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N.V.ANJARIAand HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BHARGAV D. KARIA Date : 18/10/2022 ORAL ORDER (PER : HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N.V.ANJARIA) Learned advocate Mr.Sudhir M. Mehta for thepetitioner, upon instructions, seeks permissionto withdraw the petition. Permission is granted. The petition isdismissed as withdrawn. (N.V.ANJARIA, J) (BHARGAV D. KARIA, J)

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.