Case Law › High Court › Shri Goutam Chakraborty v. The Assistant...

Shri Goutam Chakraborty v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax Circle 44, Kolkata And Ors

High Court 15 Dec 2022 In favour of: Revenue

Forum / Bench

High Court · calcutta_original_side

Parties

Date of order

15 Dec 2022

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

Case summary

In Shri Goutam Chakraborty v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax Circle 44, Kolkata And Ors, the High Court (2022) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: Soumen Bhattacharjee, Adv.…for the Respondents The Court: Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submitson instruction that petitioner does not want to proceed in the matterand considering his such submission, this writ petition being WPO 75of 2020 is dismissed for non-prosecution.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

OD 18 ORDER SHEET WPO 75 of 2020 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTACONSTITUTIONAL WRIT JURISDICTIONORIGINAL SIDE SHRI GOUTAM CHAKRABORTY Vs. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE 44, KOLKATA AND ORS. BEFORE: The Hon’ble JUSTICE MD. NIZAMUDDINDate : 15[th] December, 2022 Mr. Avra Majumder, Adv.… for the petitionerMr. Soumen Bhattacharjee, Adv.…for the Respondents The Court: Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submitson instruction that petitioner does not want to proceed in the matterand considering his such submission, this writ petition being WPO 75of 2020 is dismissed for non-prosecution. TR/ (MD. NIZAMUDDIN, J.)

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.