Case Law › High Court › Shri Govind Mali v. Income Tax Officer,...

Shri Govind Mali v. Income Tax Officer, Ward 2(1), C.r. Building, Opp. Session Court,Jaipur Road, Ajmer

High Court 26 Sep 2025 In favour of: Unclear

Forum / Bench

High Court · jaipur

Parties

Date of order

26 Sep 2025

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Shri Govind Mali v. Income Tax Officer, Ward 2(1), C.r. Building, Opp. Session Court,Jaipur Road, Ajmer, the High Court (2025) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 12138/2025 Shri Govind Mali S/o Mithu Lal Mali, Aged About 34 Years, R/oPlot No. 80/84, Floor Ground, Swadeshi Mill Building, JagannathShankarsheth Marg, Cinema, Charni Road, Mumbai-400004 ----Petitioner Versus Income Tax Officer, Ward 2(1), C.r. Building, Opp. Session Court,Jaipur Road, Ajmer - 305001 ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rajat Sharma with Mr. Saksham Pandey : Mr. Parth Vashistha for Mr. Shantanu Sharma HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEET PUROHITJudgment / Order 26/09/2025 Learned counsels for the respective parties submit that thecontroversy involved herein is no more res integra and standsresolved by a coordinate Bench order of this Court dated09.09.2025 passed in the case of Dileep Singh Shekhawat (2021-22) versus Union of India & Anr.: DB Civil WritPetition No.6462/2025. They, therefore, pray that this writpetition may also be disposed of in similar terms. Ordered accordingly. Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of. (SANJEET PUROHIT),J (MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL),J Manish/12

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.