Shri Hukum Chand Jain v. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Kota
High Court
27 Jan 2017 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · jaipur
Parties
Shri Hukum Chand Jain v. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Kota
Date of order
27 Jan 2017
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In Shri Hukum Chand Jain v. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Kota, the High Court (2017) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: 5.The appeal stands dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH ATJAIPUR
D.B. Income Tax Appeal No. 389 / 2008
Shri Hukum Chand Jain, Proprietor, Jain Machinery Kaithoon.
----Appellant
Versus
1.Commissioner of Income Tax, Kota.
2.The I.T.O., Ward-2(1), Kota.
----Respondents
_____________________________________________________
For Appellant(s) : Mr. P.K. Kasliwal.
For Respondent(s) : Mrs. Parinitoo Jain.
_____________________________________________________
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.S. JHAVERI
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINIT KUMAR MATHURJudgment
Per Hon’ble Jhaveri J.
27/01/2017
1.By way of this appeal, the appellant has challenged thejudgment and order of the Tribunal whereby the Tribunal haspartly allowed the appeal of the assessee and rejected the SecondMisc. Application filed by him.
2.This Court while admitting the appeal on 07.11.2008 hasframed the following substantial question of law:
“(i)Whether,onthefactsandcircumstances of the case, the Tribunal wasjustified in holding that Second Misc.Application, filed u/s.254(2) of the Act bythe appellant against the order dated27.02.2006, passed by the Tribunal is non-maintainable?”
Review Application is not maintainable. In our view, the firstreview application is not entertained, then the appropriate remedyavailable is to challenge the same by way of writ petition. Secondreview application is not maintainable.
4.In that view of the matter, the issue is answered in favour ofthe department and against the assessee.
5.The appeal stands dismissed.
(VINIT KUMAR MATHUR)J. (K.S. JHAVERI)J.
Asheesh Kr. Yadav/108
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.