In Shri. Inder v. Nankani, Huf, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal.
Decision: For the same reasons, we find no merit in this appeal and consequently, the same is dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Dr. Dasnial with Mr. D.S. Hadade for the Respondent.
CORAM : F.I.REBELLO & R.S.MOHITE, JJ.DATE : 24TH FEBRUARY,2009.
PC :
1. The assessee in Income Tax Appeal No.128 of 2009 isin his individual capacity and in the instant caseassessee is HUF. The impugned order is the same. It isdated 18.8.2006.The facts in issue and the question oflaw are the same. By a separate order passed today, wehave dismissed the appeal preferred by the revenue in sofar as assessee in his individual capacity. For the
same reasons, we find no merit in this appeal and
consequently, the same is dismissed.
(R.S. MOHITE, J.)
(F.I. REBELLO, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue