Case Law › High Court › Shri Keshav Kumar v. Comm.of Income Tax-...

Shri Keshav Kumar v. Comm.of Income Tax-Ii Patna

High Court 09 Mar 2011 In favour of: Revenue

Forum / Bench

High Court · patnahcucisdb94

Parties

Date of order

09 Mar 2011

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Shri Keshav Kumar v. Comm.of Income Tax-Ii Patna, the High Court (2011) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.22216 of 2010 1.PANDOOI PLACE, A PARTNERSHIP FIRM,HAVING ITS OFFICE AT BORING ROAD P.O. & P.S. BUDHA COLONY, PATNA THROUGH ITS PARTNER, SHRI RANJAN KUMAR, S/O SHRI BAMESHWAR PRASAD NARAYAN SINGH R/O BORING ROAD, P.S.- BUDHA COLONY, PATNA ROAD P.O. & P.S. BUDHA COLONY, PATNA THROUGH ITS PARTNER, SHRI RANJAN KUMAR, S/O SHRI BAMESHWAR PRASAD NARAYAN SINGH R/O BORING ROAD, P.S.- BUDHA COLONY, PATNA 2.SHRI RANJAN KUMAR S/O SHRI BAMESHWAR PRASAD NARAYAN SINGH, R/O BORING ROAD, P.O. & P.S. BUDHA COLONY, PATNA R/O BORING ROAD, P.O. & P.S. BUDHA COLONY, PATNA 3.SHRI JADUBANSH MANI, S/O SRI BAMESHWAR PRASAD NARAYAN SINGH R/O BORING ROAD, PATNA, P.O. & P.S. BUDHA COLONY PATNA R/O BORING ROAD, PATNA, P.O. & P.S. BUDHA COLONY PATNA 4.SHRI KESHAV KUMAR S/O SHRI BAMESHWAR PRASAD NARAYAN SINGH R/O BORING ROAD, P.S.- BUDHA COLONY, PATNA BORING ROAD, P.S.- BUDHA COLONY, PATNA 5.SMT. CHUNAMANI W/O SRI RAGHUWANS MANI R/O BORING ROAD, P.S.- BUDHA COLONY, PATNA BUDHA COLONY, PATNA ………….Petitioners Versus 1.COMM.OF INCOME TAX-II PATNA HAVING ITS OFFICE AT 2 FLOOR, CENTRAL REVENUE BUILDING, BIRCHAND PATEL MARG, PATNA CENTRAL REVENUE BUILDING, BIRCHAND PATEL MARG, PATNA 2.THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-5 (4) PATNA HAVING ITS OFFICE AT 3 FLOOR, LOK NAYAK JAI PRAKASH BHAWAN, DAK BUNGALOW ROAD, PATNA 3 FLOOR, LOK NAYAK JAI PRAKASH BHAWAN, DAK BUNGALOW ROAD, PATNA …………..Opposite Parties ----------- 2. 09.03.2011 No one appears on behalf of the petitioners. The petitioners have sought quashing of the order dated 24.3.2009 passed by Special Judge, Economic Offence, Patna in Complaint Case No. 168 (C) of 2009, by which he has taken cognizance under Section 2276-C of I.T. Act, 1961. On going through the order impugned filed herein as also the petition, I find no reason to interfere in the impugned order. The application is dismissed. Fahad. ( Anjana Prakash, J. )

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.