Shri. Lsanaka Lvlastan Reddy v. Prasad, Sanath And Rajasekhara, C. As8- 2
High Court
18 Dec 2024 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Shri. Lsanaka Lvlastan Reddy v. Prasad, Sanath And Rajasekhara, C. As8- 2
Date of order
18 Dec 2024
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Shri. Lsanaka Lvlastan Reddy v. Prasad, Sanath And Rajasekhara, C. As8- 2, the High Court (2024) dismissed the appeal.
Decision: Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn interms of the iiberty as prayed for.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANAAT HYDERABADWEDNESDAY, THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF DECEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE ALOK ARADHEANDTHE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE J SREENIVAS RAO
INCOME TAX TRIBUNAL APPEAL NO:118 OF 2023
Appeal filed under Section 2604 of the lncome Tax Act, 196.1 against theOrder dated 28.02.2023 passed in l.T.A.No. 5lHydl2O23 for Assessmenlyeat 2O1g-20 on the file of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad [,A, ]Bench,Hyderabad preferred against the Order dated 30.11.2022 passed in Appeal No.1046712018-19 on the file of the Commissioner of tncome Tax (Appeats) - [.12, ]6thFloor, Aayakar Bhawan, Basheerbagh, Hyderabad preferred against the AssessmentOrder dated 26.03.2022 passed in PAN No. AJRPI\I1992K on the fite of theAssistant Commissioner of lncome Tax, Central Circle - 2(3), Hyderabad.
Between:
The Pr. Commissioner of lncome Tax - Central, Hyderabad
...APPELLANT
AND
Shri. lsanaka lVlastan Reddy, C/o M. V. Prasad, Sanath and Rajasekhara, C. As8- 2- 12018613, Krishna Sindhu Residency, Road No. 03, Banjaia Hiils,Hyderabad 500034. PAN No.
...,RESPONDENT
Counsel for the Appellant : Ms. K Mamata Choudary, Senior Standingcounsel for lncome Tax Departmentcounsel for lncome Tax Department
Counsel for the Respondent : None appeared
The Court made the following:
/"
./
THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE ALOK
ANDTHE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE J.SREENIVAS
INCOM E TAX TRIBUNAL APPEAL No.118 of [2o23]
JUDGMENT: [tP,?r ]the Hon'bte tte ch[ieJ ][Justice ][ALok ][Aradhe)]
Ms. K.Mamata Choudary, learned Senior [Slanding]Counsel for Income Tax Department for the appellart.
2. Learne,l Senior Standing Counsel for the appellantseeks leave c,f this Court to withdraw the appeal in the lightof the Circular No.09/2024, dated 17.O9.2O24, [r.r'ith ]theliberty to rel ive the same in case the subject matter of theappeal lal1s in any of the exceptions provided in theCircular No.:> I 2024 dated 15.03.2024.
3. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn interms of the iiberty as prayed for.
Miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shal1stand closed. However, there shall be no order as to costs.stand closed. However, there shall be no order as to costs.
A.V.S.S.C.S.M. SARMAJorNrfEGtsrRAR
//TRUE COPY//
sec/r6ru oFFtcER
To,
1. The Incomer Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad 'A' Bench,Hyderabad.Hyderabad.
\2. The Commis;sioner of lncome Tax (Appeals) - 12, 6th Floor, AayakarBhawan, Basheerbagh, Hyderabad.Bhawan, Basheerbagh, Hyderabad.
3. The Assistant Commissioner of lncome Tax, Central Circle - 2(3),HyderabadHyderabad
4. one CC to iVs. K lr/lamata Choudary, Senior Standing counselfor lncome Tax Department for lncome Tax Department 5- Two CD Copie,s
D
h
- ::t-_:'-':::a_::--':*- [_"_ ]-- -
II
II
HIGH COURT
DATED:1811212024
'S1 ATE OF-lf?^sE6Jo1t$ [ltrtt]2o*/rj L n-;l'
ORDERlTTA.No.118 of 2023
DISMISSING THE APPEAL AS WITHDRAWN.
@rt\,
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.