Case LawHigh Court › Shri. Lsanaka Lvlastan Reddy v. Prasad,...

Shri. Lsanaka Lvlastan Reddy v. Prasad, Sanath And Rajasekhara, C. As8- 2

High Court 18 Dec 2024 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Shri. Lsanaka Lvlastan Reddy v. Prasad, Sanath And Rajasekhara, C. As8- 2
Date of order
18 Dec 2024
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Shri. Lsanaka Lvlastan Reddy v. Prasad, Sanath And Rajasekhara, C. As8- 2, the High Court (2024) dismissed the appeal.

Decision: Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn interms of the iiberty as prayed for.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANAAT HYDERABADWEDNESDAY, THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF DECEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR PRESENT THE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE ALOK ARADHEANDTHE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE J SREENIVAS RAO INCOME TAX TRIBUNAL APPEAL NO:118 OF 2023 Appeal filed under Section 2604 of the lncome Tax Act, 196.1 against theOrder dated 28.02.2023 passed in l.T.A.No. 5lHydl2O23 for Assessmenlyeat 2O1g-20 on the file of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad [,A, ]Bench,Hyderabad preferred against the Order dated 30.11.2022 passed in Appeal No.1046712018-19 on the file of the Commissioner of tncome Tax (Appeats) - [.12, ]6thFloor, Aayakar Bhawan, Basheerbagh, Hyderabad preferred against the AssessmentOrder dated 26.03.2022 passed in PAN No. AJRPI\I1992K on the fite of theAssistant Commissioner of lncome Tax, Central Circle - 2(3), Hyderabad. Between: The Pr. Commissioner of lncome Tax - Central, Hyderabad ...APPELLANT AND Shri. lsanaka lVlastan Reddy, C/o M. V. Prasad, Sanath and Rajasekhara, C. As8- 2- 12018613, Krishna Sindhu Residency, Road No. 03, Banjaia Hiils,Hyderabad 500034. PAN No. ...,RESPONDENT Counsel for the Appellant : Ms. K Mamata Choudary, Senior Standingcounsel for lncome Tax Departmentcounsel for lncome Tax Department Counsel for the Respondent : None appeared The Court made the following: /" ./ THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE ALOK ANDTHE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE J.SREENIVAS INCOM E TAX TRIBUNAL APPEAL No.118 of [2o23] JUDGMENT: [tP,?r ]the Hon'bte tte ch[ieJ ][Justice ][ALok ][Aradhe)] Ms. K.Mamata Choudary, learned Senior [Slanding]Counsel for Income Tax Department for the appellart. 2. Learne,l Senior Standing Counsel for the appellantseeks leave c,f this Court to withdraw the appeal in the lightof the Circular No.09/2024, dated 17.O9.2O24, [r.r'ith ]theliberty to rel ive the same in case the subject matter of theappeal lal1s in any of the exceptions provided in theCircular No.:> I 2024 dated 15.03.2024. 3. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn interms of the iiberty as prayed for. Miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shal1stand closed. However, there shall be no order as to costs.stand closed. However, there shall be no order as to costs. A.V.S.S.C.S.M. SARMAJorNrfEGtsrRAR //TRUE COPY// sec/r6ru oFFtcER To, 1. The Incomer Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad 'A' Bench,Hyderabad.Hyderabad. \2. The Commis;sioner of lncome Tax (Appeals) - 12, 6th Floor, AayakarBhawan, Basheerbagh, Hyderabad.Bhawan, Basheerbagh, Hyderabad. 3. The Assistant Commissioner of lncome Tax, Central Circle - 2(3),HyderabadHyderabad 4. one CC to iVs. K lr/lamata Choudary, Senior Standing counselfor lncome Tax Department for lncome Tax Department 5- Two CD Copie,s D h - ::t-_:'-':::a_::--':*- [_"_ ]-- - II II HIGH COURT DATED:1811212024 'S1 ATE OF-lf?^sE6Jo1t$ [ltrtt]2o*/rj L n-;l' ORDERlTTA.No.118 of 2023 DISMISSING THE APPEAL AS WITHDRAWN. @rt\,
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan