Shri Mahavir Sthan Nyas Samiti, Mahavir Mandir, Patna v. The Union Of India Through Chief Commissioner Income Tax
High Court
21 Feb 2018 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · patnahcucisdb94
Parties
Shri Mahavir Sthan Nyas Samiti, Mahavir Mandir, Patna v. The Union Of India Through Chief Commissioner Income Tax
Date of order
21 Feb 2018
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Shri Mahavir Sthan Nyas Samiti, Mahavir Mandir, Patna v. The Union Of India Through Chief Commissioner Income Tax, the High Court (2018) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNACivil Review No.527 of 2016
InCivil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.20698 of 2010
======================================================
Shri Mahavir Sthan Nyas Samiti, Mahavir Mandir, Patna through its SecretaryKishore Kunal, Mahavir Mandir, Near Patna Junction, P.S. Kotwali, Distt. -Patna
... ... Petitioner/sVersus
1. The Union of India through Chief Commissioner Income Tax
2. The Commissioner Income Tax - 1, C.R. Building, 1st Floor, Birchand PatelMarg, PatnaMarg, Patna
3. The Bihar State Board of Religious Trusts through its President, VidyapatiMarg, Patna - 1Marg, Patna - 1
4. The State of Bihar through Chief Secretary, Bihar, Patna
5. The Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Revenue Building, 1[st] Floor,Birchand Patel Marg, Patna-1Birchand Patel Marg, Patna-1
... ... Respondent/s
======================================================Appearance :For the Petitioner/s: Mr. Shekhar Singh, AdvocateMr. Sumit Kumar, AdvocateFor the Respondent 1 to 5:Mrs. Archana Sinha @ Archana Shahi, Adv. Mrs. Shalini Bihari, AdvocateFor Respondents 3 and 4:Mr. Ganpati Trivedi, Sr. Advocate======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE RAVI RANJAN
and HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA MISHRA
ORAL ORDER
(Per: HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE RAVI RANJAN)
621-02-2018
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits, on the strength
of one of assessment order dated 28.12.2017, a copy of whichhas been produced at the time of hearing, that this reviewapplication has now become infructuous.
Learned counsel appearing for the Department does nothave any objection, if such order is passed.
Accordingly, this application stands disposed of as having
become infructuous.
(Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J) ( Anjana Mishra, J)V.K.Pandey/-U
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue