Shri Manohar Lal Lakhara v. The Income Tax Officer, Ward-2, Bhilwara
High Court
16 Jul 2012 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · jaipur
Parties
Shri Manohar Lal Lakhara v. The Income Tax Officer, Ward-2, Bhilwara
Date of order
16 Jul 2012
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In Shri Manohar Lal Lakhara v. The Income Tax Officer, Ward-2, Bhilwara, the High Court (2012) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Appeal as well as Application under Section 5 of theLimitation Act are, accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn withliberty, as prayed for.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR
D.B. INCOME TAX APPEAL No.595/ 2011
Shri Manohar Lal Lakhara
vs
The Income Tax Officer, Ward-2, Bhilwara.
DATE OF JUDGMENT
: 1 6[t h] Ju ly , 2 01 2
HON'BLE MR. JUSTI CE NARENDRA KUMAR JAI N- IHON'BLE MI SS JUSTI CE BELA M. TRI VEDI
Mr.Mahendra Gargieya, for appellant.
Learned counsel for appellant submitted that appeal, inthe present matter, will lie to Principal Seat at Jodhpur and notto this Court, therefore, he may be permitted to withdraw thisappeal with liberty to file fresh appeal before Principal Seat atJodhpur.
Prayer is allowed.
Appeal as well as Application under Section 5 of theLimitation Act are, accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn withliberty, as prayed for.
( BELA M. TRI VEDI ) ,J. ( NARENDRA KUMAR JAI N- I ) ,J.Sanjay S.No. “All corrections made in the judgment/order have been incorporated in the judgment/order being emailed.” Sanjay Solanki Jr.PA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue