Case LawHigh Court › Shri Mohan Singh v. Commissioner Of Inco...

Shri Mohan Singh v. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Panchkula

High Court 04 Jul 2013 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · phhc
Parties
Shri Mohan Singh v. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Panchkula
Date of order
04 Jul 2013
Assessment year(s)
1993-94
Outcome
Allowed

Case summary

In Shri Mohan Singh v. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Panchkula, the High Court (2013) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: In view of agreement between counsel for the parties, theappeals are allowed, order dated 30.6.2004, passed by the Income TaxAppellate Tribunal, Chandigarh Bench, for the assessment year 1993-94, is set aside. [ Rajive Bhalla ] Judge July 04, 2013. kadyan [Dr.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANAAT CHANDIGARH ITA No.282 of 2004 Date of decision: July 04, 2013. Shri Mohan Singh ... Appellant v. Commissioner of Income Tax, Panchkula ... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIVE BHALLAHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DR. BHARAT BHUSHAN PARSOON Present:Shri Pankaj Jain, Advocate, for the appellant.Shri Yogesh Putney, Advocate for the respondent. Rajive Bhalla, J. (Oral): This order shall dispose of ITA No.282 of 2004, ITANo.102 of 2005 and ITA No.142 of 2005 as they involve adjudicationof same questions of facts and law. For the sake of convenience, factsare being taken from ITA No.282 of 2004. The revenue has filed the present appeal under Section260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, challenging the correctness oforder dated 30.6.2004, passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal,Chandigarhi Bench, for the assessment year 1993-94. Counsel for the parties agree that the questions of law framed in the present appeals have been answered in favour of therevenue in ITA No.498 of 2005 titled as “Commissioner of Income- Tax, Karnal Versus Puneet Chugh”, decided on 07.02.2011, and, ITA No.282 of 2004 -2- therefore, the present appeals may be allowed in terms of theaforementioned judgment. In view of agreement between counsel for the parties, theappeals are allowed, order dated 30.6.2004, passed by the Income TaxAppellate Tribunal, Chandigarh Bench, for the assessment year 1993-94, is set aside. [ Rajive Bhalla ] Judge July 04, 2013. kadyan [Dr. Bharat Bhushan Parsoon] Judge
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan