Shri N.kanagendranno.137, Jawaharlal Nehru Sali,Ekkaduthangal,Chennai – 600 097 v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income-Tax,Company Circle – I(3)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 06.07.2021 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M. DURAISWAMYANDTHE HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE R. HEMALATHA Tax Case Appeal Nos.1243, 1244 and 1246 of 2009 Shri N.KanagendranNo.137, Jawaharlal Nehru Sali,Ekkaduthangal,Chennai – 600 097. .. Appellant in all appeals Vs. The Assistant Commissioner of Income-Tax,Company Circle – I(3),121, Nungambakkam High Road,Chennai – 600 034. ... Respondent in all appeals Tax Case Appeals in Tax Case Appeal Nos.1243, 1244 and 1246of 2009 filed under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Chennai"B" Bench, dated 26.06.2009 passed in I.T.A.Nos.2016/Mds/2008,2017/Mds/2008 and 2046/Mds/2008 respectively. TCA No.1243 of 2009:-Appeal filed under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, 'B'Bench, Chennai dated 26.06.2009 in ITA No.2016/Mds/2008 for theAssessment Year 2001-02 against the Order of the Commissioner ofIncome Tax Appeals(A)-III, Chennai dated 29.07.2008 in ITANo.32/2007-08/A-III, against the levy of penalty order of theAssistant Commissioner of Income Tax Company Circle 1(3)Chennai-34 dated 22.03.2007, against the order of theproceedings of the Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, CompanyCircle 1(3) (i/c), Chennai dated 30.03.2004 for the AssessmentYears 2001-02; TCA No.1244 of 2009:-Appeal filed under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, 'B' https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ Bench, Chennai dated 26.06.2009 in ITA No.2017/Mds/2008 for theAssessment Year 2002-03 against the Order of the Commissioner ofIncome Tax Appeals(A)-III, Chennai dated 29.07.2008 in ITANo.17/2008-09/A-III, against the levy of penalty order of theAssistant Commissioner of Income Tax Company Circle 1(3)Chennai-34 dated 28.03.2008, against the order of theproceedings of the Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, CompanyCircle 1(3) (i/c), Chennai dated 24.04.2006 for the AssessmentYears 2002-03; TCA No.1246 of 2009:-Appeal filed under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, 'B'Bench, Chennai dated 26.06.2009 in ITA No.2046/Mds/2008 for theAssessment Year 2003-04 against the Order of the Commissioner ofIncome Tax Appeals(A)-III, Chennai dated 29.07.2008 in ITANo.32/2007-08, against the levy of penalty order of theAssistant Commissioner of Income Tax Company Circle 1(3)Chennai-34 dated 22.03.2007, against the order of theproceedings of the Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, CompanyCircle 1(3) (i/c), Chennai dated 30.03.2004 for the AssessmentYears 2003-04; For Appellant : Ms.Sri Niranjani Srinivasan for M/s.N.Muthukumar in all appealsFor Respondent : Mr.Karthik Ranganathan Senior Standing Counsel in all appeals C O M M O N J U D G M E N T(Delivered by M.DURAISWAMY, J.) The above appeals filed by the assessee under Section 260Aof the Income Tax Act, 1961 ('the Act' for brevity), aredirected against the order dated 26.06.2009 passed by the IncomeTax Appellate Tribunal, Chennai "B" Bench, ('the Tribunal' forbrevity)inI.T.A.Nos.2016/Mds/2008,2017/Mds/2008and2046/Mds/2008 for the assessment years 2001-02, 2002-03 and2001-02 respectively. The above appeals were admitted on thefollowing common substantial question of law : "Whether on the facts and in the circumstances ofthe case the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal is right inlaw in confirming the levy of penalty under Section271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act in respect of Assessment Year 2000-01?” 2. We have heard Ms.Sri Niranjani Srinivasan, learnedcounsel for the appellant/assessee and Mr.Karthik Ranganathan,learned Senior Standing Counsel for the respondent/Revenue. "Whether on the facts and in the circumstances ofthe case the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal is right inlaw in confirming the levy of penalty under Section271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act in respect of Assessment Year 2000-01?” 2. We have heard Ms.Sri Niranjani Srinivasan, learnedcounsel for the appellant/assessee and Mr.Karthik Ranganathan,learned Senior Standing Counsel for the respondent/Revenue. 3. It may not be necessary for this Court to decide theSubstantial Questions of Law framed for consideration on accountof certain subsequent developments. The Government of Indiaenacted the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020 (Act 3 of2020) to provide for resolution of disputed tax and for mattersconnected therewith or incidental thereto. The Act of theParliament received the assent of the President on 17[th] March2020 and published in the Gazette of India on 17[th] March 2020. 4. We are informed by the learned counsel for the appellant/assessee that the assessee had already been issued with Form-3on 08.02.2021 and the learned counsel for the appellant seekspermission of this Court to withdraw the above appeals. 5. In view of the submission made by the learned counsel forthe appellant/assessee, the above Tax Case Appeals standdismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS-VII) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar mkn To 1. The Registrar, Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Chennai "B" Bench Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Chennai "B" Bench 2. The Commissioner of Income Tax (A)-III, Chennai-34. Chennai-34. 3. The Assistant Commissioner of Income-Tax, Company Circle – I(3), 121, Nungambakkam High Road, Chennai – 600 034. +1cc to M/s.Sriniranjani, Advocate, S.R.No.31253 (18/10/2021) PPA(CO)SU(27/09/2021)