Shri Prabodh v. The Joint Commissioner Of Income Tax
High Court
25 Mar 2015 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · testcase
Parties
Shri Prabodh v. The Joint Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
25 Mar 2015
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Shri Prabodh v. The Joint Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2015) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYNAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR
CIVIL APPLICATION (W) NO. 614/2015
IN
WRIT PETITION NO. 3118 /2014
(Shri Prabodh s/o Sadashiv Sadavarte vs. The Joint Commissioner of Income Tax
and another )
..........................................................................................................................
Office Notes, Office Memoranda ofCoram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's order of directions and Registrar's orders
...................................................................................................................................................................Mr. S.N.Bhattad, Adv. for petitioner
Mr Anand Parchure, Adv. for respondents
CORAM: SMT.VASANTI A. NAIK & A.M.BADAR, JJ.DATED : 25[th ] March, 2015.
Heard.
It is stated on behalf of the Department that the non-applicant/assessee is not permitting the Department to complete the assessment. It is stated that in similar Writ Petition, this Court had permitted the Department to complete the assessment.
In view of the aforesaid and on a perusal of the order dated 10.3.2014 in Writ Petition No. 6373/2013, we permit the applicant/respondents to complete the assessment. However, the assessment shall be without prejudice to the rights and contentions of the petitioner-assessee. The petitioner-assessee should cooperate with the Department for completion of the assessment. If any recovery is worked out, the same shall not be given
sahare
an effect to, until further orders of this Court.
Civil Application is allowed in the aforesaid
terms and disposed of.
JUDGE
JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue