Shri Pradipta Kumar Das v. Assistant Commissionr Of Income Tax
High Court
09 Mar 2023 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
Shri Pradipta Kumar Das v. Assistant Commissionr Of Income Tax
Date of order
09 Mar 2023
Assessment year(s)
2013-14
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Shri Pradipta Kumar Das v. Assistant Commissionr Of Income Tax, the High Court (2023) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: O R D E R At request of and by way of endorsement made by Mr.Suhrith Parthasarathy, learned counsel for the petitioner, to withdraw this Writ Petition, this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn, as are the connected Miscellaneous Petitions.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
W.P.No.9580 of 2020
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Dated: 09.03.2023
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE ANITA SUMANTH
W.P.No.9580 of 2020and WMP Nos.11695 and 11696 of 2020
Shri Pradipta Kumar Das
Vs
... Petitioner
Assistant Commissionr of Income Tax,
Non Corporate Circle – 17(1),Chennai.
... Respondent
PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondent to expeditiously process and refund sum of Rs.74,241/- wrongly wrongly deducted by the respondent in relation to Assessment Year 2013-14.
For Petitioner : Mr.Suhrith Parthasarathy
For Respondent
: Mr.Prabhu Mukund Arun Kumar Junior Standing Counsel
Dr.ANITA SUMANTH,J.
O R D E R
At request of and by way of endorsement made by Mr.Suhrith Parthasarathy, learned counsel for the petitioner, to withdraw this Writ Petition,
this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn, as are the connected Miscellaneous Petitions. No costs.
Index : Yes / NoSpeaking Order Neutral Citation : Yessl
09.03.2023
To
Assistant Commissionr of Income Tax,Non Corporate Circle – 17(1),Chennai.
W.P.No.9580 of 2020and WMP Nos.11695 and 11696 of 2020
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue