Shri Prem Chand Jain v. The Income Tax Officer, Ward-4 (2), Jaipur
High Court
01 Jul 2020 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · jaipur
Parties
Shri Prem Chand Jain v. The Income Tax Officer, Ward-4 (2), Jaipur
Date of order
01 Jul 2020
Assessment year(s)
2014-15
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Shri Prem Chand Jain v. The Income Tax Officer, Ward-4 (2), Jaipur, the High Court (2020) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: 5.Accordingly, the appeal stands dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
D.B. Income Tax Appeal No.41/2019
Shri Prem Chand Jain, 8/314, Vidhyadhar Nagar, Jaipur.
----Appellant
Versus
The Income Tax Officer, Ward-4 (2), Jaipur.
----Respondent
For Appellant(s) : Mr. Sandeep Taneja through VCFor Respondent(s):
HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAKASH GUPTA
Order
01/07/2020
1.Heard learned counsel for the appellant and perusedthe grounds taken herein and also perused the order passed bythe Income Tax Appellate Authority (ITAT).
2.Learned counsel for the appellant fairly admits that theappellant did not produce any books of accounts since he has lostthe same before the income tax authorities.
3.On perusal of the same, it appears that the appellant
had a sale turnover in the assessment year 2014-15 for a sum of₹26.9 Crores and he indicated the gross profit of 24.9 Lacs on₹total sales, which effectively amounted to only 0.93%. Theappellant submitted that his books of accounts were lost intransaction for which he has lodged the FIR.
4.After perusing the order of the ITAT, we do not find anyjustifiable cause to interfere with the same.
5.Accordingly, the appeal stands dismissed.
(PRAKASH GUPTA),J
(INDRAJIT MAHANTY),CJ
Anil Goyal-PS/PKM/8
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.