Case LawHigh Court › Shri. Rajkumar U. Bhansali v. Dy. Commis...

Shri. Rajkumar U. Bhansali v. Dy. Commissioner Of Income Tax And Ors

High Court 29 Jan 2013 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Shri. Rajkumar U. Bhansali v. Dy. Commissioner Of Income Tax And Ors
Date of order
29 Jan 2013
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Shri. Rajkumar U. Bhansali v. Dy. Commissioner Of Income Tax And Ors, the High Court (2013) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: 4)The appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

ASN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1645 OF 2012 Shri. Rajkumar U. Bhansali. ..Appellant. v. Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax and ors. ..Respondent. None for the Appellant.None for the Respondent. CORAM : J.P. DEVADHAR AND M.S. SANKLECHA, JJ. DATE : 29TH JANUARY, 2013 PC: None for the appellant. 2) Matter was on board Yesterday. At that time also none appeared for the appellant. Therefore, the matter was adjourned to today. Today also none appears for the appellant. In view of the above, the appeal is dismissed. 3)Even otherwise on merits the impugned order of the Tribunal is based on a finding of fact that the transaction in ASN respect of which the deduction as bad debts is claimed by the appellant is not a genuine transaction. Consequently, no question of writing off a fictitious debt can arise. Further, the appellant himself has admitted in the proceeding before the Special Metropolitan Magistrate and the Judge of the Court of Small Causes Mumbai that the alleged debtor had never placed any order of goods nor did the alleged debtor sign any cheque in respect of which proceedings were instituted by the appellant herein. Since the decision is based on a finding of fact, even on merits, we see no reason to entertain the present appeal. 4)The appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs. (M.S.SANKLECHA, J.) (J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan