Shri Rajlaxmi Denim Ltd., Shop v. The Income Tax Officer, Ward-4, Bhilwara (Rajasthan
High Court
14 Feb 2018 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · rhcjodh240618
Parties
Shri Rajlaxmi Denim Ltd., Shop v. The Income Tax Officer, Ward-4, Bhilwara (Rajasthan
Date of order
14 Feb 2018
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Shri Rajlaxmi Denim Ltd., Shop v. The Income Tax Officer, Ward-4, Bhilwara (Rajasthan, the High Court (2018) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN ATJODHPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 2053 / 2018
Shri Rajlaxmi Denim Ltd., Shop No. 35, Badal Complex, Bhilwara -311 001 (Rajasthan). (through Its Director Laxmikant Sodhani S/oShri Prakashchand Sodhani)
----Petitioner
Versus
1. The Income Tax Officer, Ward-4, Bhilwara (Rajasthan);
2. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), I.e. CIT (Appeals), Ajmer (Rajasthan).
----Respondents
_____________________________________________________
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sanjeev Johari
_____________________________________________________
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIRMALJIT KAUR
Order
14/02/2018
It is not disputed that the appeal against the order dated29/12/2017 is still pending before the respondent No.2. In spite ofthe same, the present writ petition has been filed seeking releaseof the bank account which has since been attached withoutapproaching the concerned authority for the interim relief as wellas without any order having been passed rejecting the said relief.
Dismissed accordingly.
(NIRMALJIT KAUR),J.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.