Case LawHigh Court › Shri Ramchandra Dalvi v. Income Tax Offi...

Shri Ramchandra Dalvi v. Income Tax Officer, Ward-2(1

High Court 17 Oct 2025 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · testcase
Parties
Shri Ramchandra Dalvi v. Income Tax Officer, Ward-2(1
Date of order
17 Oct 2025
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Allowed

Case summary

In Shri Ramchandra Dalvi v. Income Tax Officer, Ward-2(1, the High Court (2025) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

1 wp 4052.2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYNAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR Civil Application (CAW) No. 2529 of 2025 in WRIT PETITION NO. 4052 OF 2023 [M/s. Sunflag Iron and Steel Co. Ltd., through its Director Shri Ramchandra Dalvi vs. Income Tax Officer, Ward-2(1), Nagpur and ors.] - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's ordersappearances, Court's orders of directionsand Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ------------------ - - - Mr. S. C. Thakar, Advocate for the applicant/petitioner Mr. B. N. Mohata, Advocate for the respondent nos. 1 and 2 CORAM: ANIL L. PANSARE AND Y. G. KHOBRAGADE, JJ. DATED : 17-10-2025. For the reasons set out in the application, theapplication is allowed. Amendment shall be carried out withinseven working days. List the petition once amendments arecarried out. (Y. G. KHOBRAGADE, J.)(A. L. PANSARE, J.) wasnik
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan