Shri Ramesh Chand Agarwal v. Shri Rakesh Gupta
High Court
16 Sep 2020 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · jaipur
Parties
Shri Ramesh Chand Agarwal v. Shri Rakesh Gupta
Date of order
16 Sep 2020
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Shri Ramesh Chand Agarwal v. Shri Rakesh Gupta, the High Court (2020) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 15094/2019
1. Smt Manorama Devi W/o Late Shri RamsinghGarg(Deceased), (Deleted Vides Order Dated 24.1.2019) B/c Agarwal, R/o 6, Income Tax Colony, Vaishali Nagar, JaipurGarg(Deceased), (Deleted Vides Order Dated 24.1.2019) B/c Agarwal, R/o 6, Income Tax Colony, Vaishali Nagar, Jaipur
2. Shri Ramesh Chand Agarwal S/o Late Shri Ramsingh Garg,Aged About 59 Years, B/c Agarwal, R/o 6, Income TaxColony, Vaishali Nagar, JaipurAged About 59 Years, B/c Agarwal, R/o 6, Income TaxColony, Vaishali Nagar, Jaipur
3. Smt. Kusum Agarwal W/o Shri Ramesh Chand Agarwal,Aged About 57 Years, B/c Agarwal, R/o 6, Income TaxColony, Vaishali Nagar, JaipurAged About 57 Years, B/c Agarwal, R/o 6, Income TaxColony, Vaishali Nagar, Jaipur
----Petitioners
Versus
Shri Rakesh Gupta S/o Late Shri Gaurishanker Gupta, M.r.Enterprises, Shop No. 56, Khailand Market, Ajmer
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s): Mr. Rahul Agarwal, through VC.
For Respondent(s): Mr. S.S. Ola, P.P.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE INDERJEET SINGHOrder
16/09/2020
A letter dated 04.07.2020 has been received from the Court ofAdditional Chief Judicial Magistrate (Rent Tribunal), Ajmer forextension of time granted by this court vide order dated 27.11.2019to decide the eviction petition.
For the reasons mentioned in the letter dated 04.07.2020, Ideem it just and proper to extend the time granted by this court todecide the eviction petition vide order dated 27.11.2019 for a furtherperiod of six months.
Office is directed to inform the concerned court below in thisregard.
(INDERJEET SINGH),J
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.