In Shri Sajjan Mithulal Makharia v. The Income Tax Officer, Ward-20, Circle-3, the High Court (2011) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: Accordingly, the Appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
k
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.6165 OF 2010
Shri Sajjan Mithulal Makharia Vs.
.. Appellant
The Income Tax Officer, Ward-20, Circle-3
.. Respondent.
Ms. Vasanti B. Patel for the appellant.
Mr. D.K. Kamwal for the respondent.
CORAM: J.P. DEVADHAR & K.K. TATED, JJ.DATE: 20TH OCTOBER, 2011.
P.C.
Counsel for the parties state that the questions raised in this Appeal are covered against the Appellant Assessee by the decision of this Court in
the case of Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Bharat R. Ruia (HUF) reported in 2011 337 ITR 52 Bom.
Accordingly, the Appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs.
(K.K. TATED, J.)
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue