Case LawHigh Court › Shri Shete Krishna Jagannath v. The Comm...

Shri Shete Krishna Jagannath v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax-Iii

High Court 03 Aug 2011 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newas
Parties
Shri Shete Krishna Jagannath v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax-Iii
Date of order
03 Aug 2011
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Allowed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Shri Shete Krishna Jagannath v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax-Iii, the High Court (2011) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JDICATURE AT BOMBAYC. A. J. WRIT PETITION NO. 4809 OF 2011 Shri Gajanan Krishna Shewale, Petitioner. VsThe Commissioner of Income Tax-III, and ors Respondents. WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 6205 OF 2011 Shri Kamal Bapulal Korbu VsThe Commissioner of Income Tax-III, Petitioner. Respondent. WITH WRIT PETITION NO.6206 OF 2011 Shri Raghunath R KakadeVsThe Commissioner of Income Tax-III, Petitioner.Respondent.Petitioner. Respondent. WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 6207 OF 2011ShriChandrakant B Phutane VsThe Commissioner of Income Tax-III, WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 6208 OF 2011 Shri Shete Krishna Jagannath Petitioner. Respondent. Vs The Commissioner of Income Tax-III, WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 6209 OF 2011 Shri Pandurang Khanderao Patil Petitioner. Vs The Commissioner of Income Tax-III, Respondent. WITH 2 WRIT PETITION NO. 6210 OF 2011 Shri Garud Sharad HaribhauVsThe Commissioner of Income Tax-III, Petitioner. Respondents. WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 6211 OF 2011 Shri Chandrakant Piraji Shinde Petitioner. Vs The Commissioner of Income Tax-III, Respondents. WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 6212 OF 2011 Shri Tanaji Atmaram SawaniPetitioner.VsThe Commissioner of Income Tax-III, Respondent. WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 6213 OF 2011ShriVilas Khando KulkarniVsThe Commissioner of Income Tax-III, WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 6214 OF 2011ShriShri Sule Shamrao SadhuVsThe Commissioner of Income Tax-III, Petitioner.Respondent.Petitioner.Respondent. Mr. Makrand Panchakshari i/b Sagar Kasar, R.G.Sikhwal, M.K.Kulkarni, for the petitioners. Mr., Vimal Gupta, for the respondent. CORAM : J.P. DEVADHAR & A.A. SAYED, JJ.DATE : 3[rd] AUGUST, 2011. 3 P.C. Counsel for the petitioners seeks to withdraw these petitions with liberty to file fresh petitions. Accordingly, all these writ petitions are allowed to be withdrawn with liberty to file fresh petitions. ( A.A. SAYED, J. ) (J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan