Case LawHigh Court › Shri Sudhakar T. Pendse v. The Income Ta...

Shri Sudhakar T. Pendse v. The Income Tax Officer

High Court 22 Jan 2009 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Shri Sudhakar T. Pendse v. The Income Tax Officer
Date of order
22 Jan 2009
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Shri Sudhakar T. Pendse v. The Income Tax Officer, the High Court (2009) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
(-1-) MGN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.4274 OF 2008 IN INCOME TAX APPEAL LODGING NO.3630 OF 2008 Shri Sudhakar T. Pendse ...Appellant Vs. The Income Tax Officer, Ward 18(2)(4) Mumbai. ..Respondent Mr. K. Gopal and Jitendra Singh for the Appellant. Mr. P.S. Sahadevan, for the Respondent. CORAM: F.I. R.S.MOHITE, JJ. DATED: 22nd January, 2009 P.C.: . Considering the cause shown, in our opinion, the same would amount to sufficient cause. Consequently delay condoned. Office to register the Appeal. (R.S.MOHITE, J.) (F.I.REBELLO,J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan