Shri Tribhuvan Kumawat v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax,Jaipur
High Court
05 Oct 2016 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · jaipur
Parties
Shri Tribhuvan Kumawat v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax,Jaipur
Date of order
05 Oct 2016
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In Shri Tribhuvan Kumawat v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax,Jaipur, the High Court (2016) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: 5.With the aforesaid observations, the appeal stands disposed of.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHANBENCH AT JAIPUR.
D.B. Income Tax Appeal No.86/2003
Shri Tribhuvan Kumawat vs. The Commissioner of Income Tax,Jaipur
DATE OF ORDER ::: 5[th] October, 2016
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.S. JHAVERIHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BANWARI LAL SHARMA
Mr. P.K. Kasliwal, for the appellant.Ms. Parinitoo Jain, for the respondent.
*****
1.By way of this appeal, the assessee has challenged thejudgment & order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunalwhereby the Tribunal has dismissed the appeal of theassessee and appeal filed by the Department is partlyallowed.
2.Counsel for the appellant has contended that whileconsidering the reasoned order of CIT (A), the tribunal whileconsidering the appeal has not given any cogent reasons.
3.We have gone through the reasons adopted by thetribunal. We are in agreement with the reasoning adoptedby the CIT(A) however, the tribunal while considering thejudgment of the AO and CIT(A) has not given cogent andconvincing reasons. Therefore, the Tribunal will consider thematter afresh in accordance with law and if they are inagreement with CIT (A) they will give reasons
4.With the above observations, the order of the tribunalis quashed and set aside. We remit back the matter to the
tribunal who will decide the same afresh within six months
from the date of receipt of the order of this court.
5.With the aforesaid observations, the appeal stands
disposed of.
(Banwari Lal Sharma), J. (K.S. Jhaveri), J.
Brijesh64.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.