Case LawHigh Court › Shri Vaman v. Thakur

Shri Vaman v. Thakur

High Court 10 Jan 2005 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Shri Vaman v. Thakur
Date of order
10 Jan 2005
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Shri Vaman v. Thakur, the High Court (2005) dismissed the appeal.

Decision: Under these circumstances, we do not find any substantial question of law involved in this Appeal, hence the same stands dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION Income Tax Appeal No. 187 of 2004 The Commissioner of Income Tax .. Appellant V/s. Shri Vaman V. Thakur .. Respondent Ms. S.V. Bharucha for the Appellant None present for the Respondent CORAM : S. RADHAKRISHNAN & CORAM : S. RADHAKRISHNAN & CORAM : S. RADHAKRISHNAN & J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ. J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ. J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED : 10.01.2005 DATED : 10.01.2005 DATED : 10.01.2005 P.C.:- P.C.:- 1. Perused the order dated 12.7.2001 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal. The Tribunal has dismissed the above Appeal on the ground that on the relevant date the issue was debatable & following the Judgment of this Court in Khatau Junkar Ltd. 196 ITR 55, Khatau Junkar Ltd. 196 ITR 55, the Appeal was dismissed. Under these circumstances, we do not find any substantial question of law involved in this Appeal, hence the same stands dismissed. (S. RADHAKRISHNAN, J.) (S. RADHAKRISHNAN, J.) (J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan