Shri Vikram Aggarwal v. Hon’ble Alok Kumar Verma,J
High Court
02 Jan 2025 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · ukhcucis_pg
Parties
Shri Vikram Aggarwal v. Hon’ble Alok Kumar Verma,J
Date of order
02 Jan 2025
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Shri Vikram Aggarwal v. Hon’ble Alok Kumar Verma,J, the High Court (2025) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR VERMA
02[nd ]JANUARY, 2025
WRIT PETITION (M/S) NO.2553 of 2022
Shri Vikram Aggarwal
..…Petitioner
Versus
Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Dehradun & Others ..…Respondents
Counsel for the Petitioner : Mr. Avidit Noliyal, Advocate. Counsel for the Respondents : Mr. Hari Mohan Bhatia, Advocate.
Hon’ble Alok Kumar Verma,J.
The present writ petition has been filed with
the following prayers:
“(i) Issue a writ in the nature of Mandamus directing the Respondent to accept Petitioner’s declaration/application and allow consequential relief under VSV Act by modifying Form 4 dated 30.10.2021 and directing the Respondent to accept payment of balance amount and issue Form 5.
(ii) Issue any other Writ, order or Direction which this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case.
(iii) To allow the writ petition with cost in favour of the petitioner and against the Respondent.”
2.
Heard Mr. Avidit Noliyal, learned counsel for
petitioner and Mr. Hari Mohan Bhatia, learned counsel for respondents on the Withdrawal Application (IA No.02 of 2024), filed by the petitioner.
3.
3.Mr. Avidit Noliyal, Advocate, submitted that an Application/Form 1 under the provisions of Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2024 is pending before the Competent Authority.
4.Mr. Avidit Noliyal, Advocate, has requested to
permit the petitioner to withdraw the present writ petition with liberty to raise all his grievances before the Competent Authority, where the Form no.1 is pending.
5. opposed the said submissions.
Mr. Hari Mohan Bhatia, Advocate, has not
6.With the consent of both the parties, the present Writ Petition (M/S No.2553 of 2022) is disposed of granting liberty to the petitioner to raise all his grievances before the Competent Authority where the Form no.1 is pending.
7. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merit of the case.
It is made clear that this Court has not
___________________
ALOK KUMAR VERMA, J.
Date:02.01.2025 Neha
NEHA BISHT
Digitally signed by NEHA BISHT DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF
UTTARAKHAND,
2.5.4.20=6f1c15b6305912b3f008e9a4a8038ee7326b08b2d0e018b01be753f014836d27, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=3D89DC33779FB F32DE6BA960BFE64D819EE44CA9CCE487B2FE0F92, cn=NEHA BISHT Date: 2025.01.02 17:52:04 +05'30'
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.