Shri Vinod Kumar Goyal v. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Jaipur-Ii, Ncr Building, Jaipur
High Court
05 Sep 2017 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · jaipur
Parties
Shri Vinod Kumar Goyal v. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Jaipur-Ii, Ncr Building, Jaipur
Date of order
05 Sep 2017
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Shri Vinod Kumar Goyal v. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Jaipur-Ii, Ncr Building, Jaipur, the High Court (2017) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH ATJAIPUR
D.B. Civil Restoraton Application No. 385 / 2017
Shri Vinod Kumar Goyal S/o M.D. Goyal, Aged About 52 Years, B-68, Saket Colony, Jaipur
----Petitioner
Versus
Commissioner of Income Tax, Jaipur-II, NCR Building, Jaipur
----Respondent
_____________________________________________________
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Gunjan Pathak with Mr. Sameer Sharma
For Respondent(s) : Mr. K.D. Mathur & Mr. Prateek Kedawat for Mr. R.B. Mathur
_____________________________________________________
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.S.JHAVERI
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE INDERJEET SINGH
Order
05/09/2017
Defects are overruled.
For the reasons mentioned in the application, the restorationapplication is allowed. The order dated 9.5.2017 is recalled.
The appeal is restored to its original number.
(INDERJEET SINGH)J.
(K.S.JHAVERI)J.
A.Sharma/73
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue