Shri Vishnu Dutt Goyal v. Commissioner Of Income Tax, N.c.r. Building Statue Circle,Jaipur
High Court
27 Nov 2017 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · jaipur
Parties
Shri Vishnu Dutt Goyal v. Commissioner Of Income Tax, N.c.r. Building Statue Circle,Jaipur
Date of order
27 Nov 2017
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In Shri Vishnu Dutt Goyal v. Commissioner Of Income Tax, N.c.r. Building Statue Circle,Jaipur, the High Court (2017) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH ATJAIPUR
D.B. Civil Review No. 160 / 2017
Shri Vishnu Dutt Goyal C/o. Lokesh Oil Mills Pvt. Ltd., SitaramBazar, Kesarganj, Ajmer.
----Petitioner
Versus
1. Commissioner of Income Tax, N.C.R. Building Statue Circle,Jaipur.
2. The A.C.I.T. , Central, Circle, Ajmer.
----RespondentsConnected With
D.B. Civil Review No. 161 / 2017 Shri Vishnu Dutt Goyal C/o Lokesh Oil Mills Pvt. Ltd., Sitaram Bazar, Kesarganj, Ajmer.
----Petitioner
Versus
1. Commissioner of Income Tax, N.C.R. Building, Statue Circle, Jaipur.
2. The A.C.I.T. Central Circle, Ajmer.
----Respondents
D.B. Civil Review No. 162 / 2017 Shri Vishnu Dutt Goyal C/o Lokesh Oil Mills Pvt. Ltd., Sitaram Bazar, Kesarganj, Ajmer.
----Petitioner
Versus
1. Commissioner of Income Tax, N.C.R. Building, Statue Circle, Jaipur.
2. The A.C.I.T. Central Circle, Ajmer.
----Respondents
_____________________________________________________
For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Parinitoo Jain For Respondent(s) : Mr. P.K. Kasliwal
_____________________________________________________
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.S. JHAVERIHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAY KUMAR VYAS
Order
27/11/2017
Heard on applications (2532/2017, 2533/2017 &2534/2017) u/s 5 of the Limitation Act.
For the reasons stated in the applications, the same areallowed. The delay in filing the review petitions is condoned.
By way of these review petitions, the petitioner hasprayed for correction in the order dated 29.05.2017 whereby theorder of the Tribunal was confirmed but inadvertently the issuewas decided in favour of assessee and appeals were allowed,whereas the issues were to be decided in favour of departmentand the appeals should have been dismissed.
For the reasons mentioned in the review petitions, thesame are allowed. The correction be carried out as stated above.
A copy of this order be placed in connected file.
(VIJAY KUMAR VYAS), J. (K.S. JHAVERI), J.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.