Case LawHigh Court › Shri Vishwa Mitter Sekhri Charitable Soc...

Shri Vishwa Mitter Sekhri Charitable Society v. Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax And Another

High Court 08 Mar 2017 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · phhc
Parties
Shri Vishwa Mitter Sekhri Charitable Society v. Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax And Another
Date of order
08 Mar 2017
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Shri Vishwa Mitter Sekhri Charitable Society v. Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax And Another, the High Court (2017) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA|AT CHANDIGARH CWP No. 3891 of 2015 (O&M)Date of decision: 8.3.2017 Shri Vishwa Mitter Sekhri Charitable Society VS _. Petitioner Chief Commissioner of Income Tax and another ..Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh BindalHon'ble Mr. Justice Harinder Singh Sidhu Present:Mr. Akshay Bhan, Senior Advocate withMr. Alok Mittal, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Denesh Goyal, Advocate, for the respondents. Rajesh Bindal, J. The petitioner filed the present petition impugning notice dated 26.3.2014 issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Asno interim stay was granted, the proceedings were completed. The orderwas passed by the Assessing Officer was challenged by filing appealbefore the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), which was alsodismissed. Now the matter is pending before the Income Tax AppellateTribunal (for short ‘the Tribunal’) in appeal filed by the petitioner. Keeping in view the aforesaid development, which has taken place during the pendency of the present petition, learned counsel for thepetitioner submitted that the prayer made in the present petition has beenrendered infructuous and the same may be disposed of as such. Thepetitioner will pursue the appeal filed by it, which is pending before theTribunal. Ordered accordingly. Needless to add that the petitioner shall be entitled to raise allthe issues to which it is entitled to in terms of the law in the pendingappeal before the Tribunal. (Rajesh Bindal)Judge 83.2017Sharmila (Harinder Singh Sidhu)Judge Whether speaking/reasoned:Whether reportable Yes/NoYes/No
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Defend a reassessment (Sec 148) notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan