Shri Vishwa Mitter Sekhri Charitable Society v. Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax And Another
High Court
08 Mar 2017 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · phhc
Parties
Shri Vishwa Mitter Sekhri Charitable Society v. Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax And Another
Date of order
08 Mar 2017
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Shri Vishwa Mitter Sekhri Charitable Society v. Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax And Another, the High Court (2017) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA|AT CHANDIGARH
CWP No. 3891 of 2015 (O&M)Date of decision: 8.3.2017
Shri Vishwa Mitter Sekhri Charitable Society
VS
_. Petitioner
Chief Commissioner of Income Tax and another
..Respondents
Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh BindalHon'ble Mr. Justice Harinder Singh Sidhu
Present:Mr. Akshay Bhan, Senior Advocate withMr. Alok Mittal, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Denesh Goyal, Advocate, for the respondents.
Rajesh Bindal, J.
The petitioner filed the present petition impugning notice
dated 26.3.2014 issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Asno interim stay was granted, the proceedings were completed. The orderwas passed by the Assessing Officer was challenged by filing appealbefore the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), which was alsodismissed. Now the matter is pending before the Income Tax AppellateTribunal (for short ‘the Tribunal’) in appeal filed by the petitioner.
Keeping in view the aforesaid development, which has taken
place during the pendency of the present petition, learned counsel for thepetitioner submitted that the prayer made in the present petition has beenrendered infructuous and the same may be disposed of as such. Thepetitioner will pursue the appeal filed by it, which is pending before theTribunal.
Ordered accordingly.
Needless to add that the petitioner shall be entitled to raise allthe issues to which it is entitled to in terms of the law in the pendingappeal before the Tribunal.
(Rajesh Bindal)Judge
83.2017Sharmila
(Harinder Singh Sidhu)Judge
Whether speaking/reasoned:Whether reportable
Yes/NoYes/No
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.