Shri Vivek Kumar Agarwal v. The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax-3, Income Taxdepartment, Jaipur.department, Jaipur
High Court
06 Feb 2025 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · jaipur
Parties
Shri Vivek Kumar Agarwal v. The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax-3, Income Taxdepartment, Jaipur.department, Jaipur
Date of order
06 Feb 2025
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Shri Vivek Kumar Agarwal v. The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax-3, Income Taxdepartment, Jaipur.department, Jaipur, the High Court (2025) decided the matter.
Decision: 4.In view of the above, the petition is disposed of relegatingthe petitioner to pursue the remedy of appeal.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 27887/2018
Shri Vivek Kumar Agarwal Prop. M/s Shree Giriraj DharanIndustries, Ajeetgarh S/o Shri Narottam Lal Agarwal, Aged 39Years, Resident Of C/o Shri Girdhari Lal Todi, Sheetla Ka Mohalla,Sikar- 332001 (Raj.)
----Petitioner
Versus
1. The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax-3, Income TaxDepartment, Jaipur.Department, Jaipur.
2. The Income Tax Officer, Ward-3, Ncr Building, SanwalliRoad, Todinagar, Sikar, Rajasthan 332001.Road, Todinagar, Sikar, Rajasthan 332001.
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Tarak Ahuja through VC for Mr. Mahendra GargieyaMr. Mahendra GargieyaFor Respondent(s): Mr. Sandeep Pathak with
Ms. Jaya P. Pathak
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR
06/02/2025
Order
1.This petition was filed challenging the notice under Section148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short ‘the Act’).
2.On 04.02.2025, following order was passed:-
“Learned counsel for the respondent
submits that during pendency of the petitionre-assessment order has been passed and thepetitioner has preferred an appeal, which ispending.
Put up on 06.02.2025 at top of thecause-list.”
3.Learned counsel for the petitioner has no instructions toenable him to refute the said contention.
4.In view of the above, the petition is disposed of relegatingthe petitioner to pursue the remedy of appeal.
5.Needless to say that the petitioner shall be at liberty to raiseall the issues raised in this petition at an appropriate stage beforethe Appellate Authority.
(PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J
(AVNEESH JHINGAN),J
Simple Kumawat /56
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.