Shri V.r.venkatachalam v. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central-I
High Court
13 Jun 2016 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
Shri V.r.venkatachalam v. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central-I
Date of order
13 Jun 2016
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Shri V.r.venkatachalam v. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central-I, the High Court (2016) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: 2.In view of the endorsement made by the learned counselappearing for the petitioner, this Writ Petition is dismissed aswithdrawn.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Coram
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE T.S.SIVAGNANAM
Writ Petition No.22272 of 2015
Shri V.R.Venkatachalam...Petitioner
Vs.
1. Commissioner of Income Tax, Central-I,No.46, Mahatma Gandhi Road,Chennai-600 034.
2. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax,Central Circle I (1),No.46, Mahatma Gandhi Road,Chennai-600 034.
...Respondents
Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution ofIndia, for issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing therespondents to release the seized jewellery weighing 4234.65 gms.
For Petitioner : Mr.L.Seetharaman
For Respondents : Mr.T.Promod Kumar Chopda
O R D E R
The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seekspermission of this Court to withdraw this Writ Petition. He alsomade an endorsement to that effect in the case bundle.
2.In view of the endorsement made by the learned counselappearing for the petitioner, this Writ Petition is dismissed aswithdrawn. No costs. sd-s/d- Assistant Registrar(CS-II) True Copy
Sub-Assistant Registrar
To
1. Commissioner of Income Tax, Central-I,No.46, Mahatma Gandhi Road,Chennai-600 034.
2. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax,Central Circle I (1),No.46, Mahatma Gandhi Road,Chennai-600 034.
+ 1 cc to Mr.T.Pramodkumar Chopda, Advocate SR 31626
gj(co)prk13/7Writ Petition No.22272 of 2015
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue