Case Law › High Court › Shri v. P. K. Jaiswal)Judge

Shri v. P. K. Jaiswal)Judge

High Court 03 Feb 2016 In favour of: Unclear

Forum / Bench

High Court · mphc_db_ind

Parties

Date of order

03 Feb 2016

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Shri v. P. K. Jaiswal)Judge, the High Court (2016) decided the matter.

Decision: 20,00,000/-, in view of the Circular dated 10[th]December, 2015, issued under the signature ofCommissioner of Income Tax (AJ), C.B.D.T.,Government of India, New Delhi, which is placed onrecord, this appeal is disposed of leaving questions oflaw open.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

pp I. T. A. No. 433 of 2007 03/02/2016 Shri R.L. Jain, learned Senior Counsel with Ms.Veena Mandlik, Advocate for the appellant. Shri V. K. Jain, learned Counsel for therespondent. Since the monetary limit involved in this appealpertaining to Assessment period 1997-98 is less thanRs. 20,00,000/-, in view of the Circular dated 10[th]December, 2015, issued under the signature ofCommissioner of Income Tax (AJ), C.B.D.T.,Government of India, New Delhi, which is placed onrecord, this appeal is disposed of leaving questions oflaw open. (P. K. Jaiswal)Judge (J. K. Jain) Judge

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.