Shri.bhupendra J.shah v. Income Tax Officer (It) -2(1
High Court
15 Dec 2008 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Shri.bhupendra J.shah v. Income Tax Officer (It) -2(1
Date of order
15 Dec 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Shri.bhupendra J.shah v. Income Tax Officer (It) -2(1, the High Court (2008) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONNOTICE OF MOTION NO.3091 OF 2008ININCOME TAX APPEAL (L)NO.950 OF 2008
Shri.Bhupendra J.Shah
Vs.Income Tax Officer (IT) -2(1)
..Appellant
..Respondent
Mr.S.G.Dalal for the Appellant.Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for the Respondent.
P.C.
CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN &V.C.DAGA, JJ.DATE : 15TH DECEMBER, 2008
.Heard the learned Counsel for the parties. Bythis Notice of Motion, the Appellant is seeking thecondonation of 2 days’ delay in filing the aboveAppeal. Perused the Notice of Motion andAffidavit-in-support thereof. Sufficient cause ismade out for condoning the delay. There is no case ofinaction negligence or want of bonafide on the part ofthe Appellant. Hence, the Notice of Motion is made
absolute in terms of prayer clause (a).
(V.C.DAGA,J.)
(DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue