Case LawHigh Court › Shri.hari Nagpal v. The Ito, Circle 26(2...

Shri.hari Nagpal v. The Ito, Circle 26(2) (2) Mumbai

High Court 17 Nov 2008 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Shri.hari Nagpal v. The Ito, Circle 26(2) (2) Mumbai
Date of order
17 Nov 2008
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Shri.hari Nagpal v. The Ito, Circle 26(2) (2) Mumbai, the High Court (2008) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.3569/2008 IN ITXAL 3285/2008 NOTICE OF MOTION NO.3569/2008 IN ITXAL 3285/2008 NOTICE OF MOTION NO.3569/2008 IN ITXAL 3285/2008 Shri.Hari Nagpal .. Appellant Vs. The ITO, Circle 26(2) (2) Mumbai .. Respondent Mr.R.Murlidharan i/by Mr.Rajan Shah & Co.for the Appellant. Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for the Respondent. CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & V.C.DAGA, JJ. CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & V.C.DAGA, JJ. DATE : 17th November, 2008 DATE : 17th November, 2008 DATE : 17th November, 2008 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard the learned Counsel for the parties. By this Notice of Motion, the Appellant is seeking condonation of 35 days’ delay caused in filing the Appeal. For the reasons stated in the affidavit-in-support of the Notice of Motion, sufficient cause is made out for condonation of delay, and there is no case of inaction, negligence or want of bonafide on the part of the Appellant. Hence, the Notice of Motion is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). (V.C.DAGA,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (V.C.DAGA,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan