In Shri.indravijaysinh Umedsinh Parmar v. Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2007) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1175 OF 2007ININCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.644 OF 2007
Shri.Indravijaysinh Umedsinh Parmar
..Applicant
Vs.
Commissioner of Income Tax
..Respondent
Mr.B.V.Jhaveri for the Applicant.Mr.A.Kotangale for the Respondent.
CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN &V.C.DAGA, JJ.
DATE : 30TH APRIL, 2007
P.C.
of the Applicant. Hence, the Notice of Motion is made
absolute in terms of prayer clause (a).
(V.C.DAGA,J.)
(DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue