Case Law β€Ί High Court β€Ί Shri.kailasam Raghavendra Rao v. The Ass...

Shri.kailasam Raghavendra Rao v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax

High Court 02 Sep 2024 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court Β· hc_cis_mas
Parties
Shri.kailasam Raghavendra Rao v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
02 Sep 2024
Assessment year(s)
2015-16
Outcome
Dismissed

The order β€” as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Shri.kailasam Raghavendra Rao v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2024) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: In view of the above submission and also the endorsement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous.

Summary auto-generated from the order below β€” read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

W.P.No.7791 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 02.09.2024 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.SARAVANAN W.P.No.7791 of 2022 andW.M.P.Nos.7815 and 7817 of 2022 Shri.Kailasam Raghavendra Rao... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle – 1(1), No.46, Mahatma Gandhi Road, Chennai – 34. 2.The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Central – 1, Chennai – 34. ... Respondents Prayer:Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for issuance of a Writ of Certiorari, to call for the records on the file of the 1[st] respondent in PAN No. and quash the impugned notice in ITBA/COM/M/17/2021-22/1033934238(1) issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 dated 30.06.2021 for the Assessment Year 2015-16 by the 1[st] respondent. For Petitioner : M/s.Vandana Vyas W.P.No.7791 of 2022 For Respondents : Mr.ANR.Jaya Pratap Junior Standing Counsel ORDER When the matter was taken up for consideration, the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that this writ petition has become infructuous and she has also made an endorsement to that effect in the Court bundle. Hence, nothing survives for adjudication in this Writ Petition. 2. In view of the above submission and also the endorsement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently, the connected Miscellaneous Petitions are also closed. 02.09.2024 Index : Yes/NoInternet : Yes/No Speaking Order/Non-Speaking OrderNeutral Citation : Yes/Nojas To 1.The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle – 1(1), No.46, Mahatma Gandhi Road, Chennai – 34. Central Circle – 1(1), No.46, Mahatma Gandhi Road, Chennai – 34. 2.The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Central – 1, Chennai – 34. Central – 1, Chennai – 34. W.P.No.7791 of 2022 W.P.No.7791 of 2022 C.SARAVANAN, J. jas W.P.No.7791 of 2022 and W.M.P.Nos.7815 and 7817 of 2022 02.09.2024
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
βœ… Defend a reassessment (Sec 148) notice β†’ πŸ’¬ Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only β€” not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press Β· Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
Β© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP Β· LLPIN ACN-4920 Β· Jaipur, Rajasthan