In Shrikam Industries v. Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2001) decided the matter.
Issue: Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? : NO -------------------------------------------------------------- SHRIKAM INDUSTRIES Versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: MR MJ SHAH WITH MR JP SHAH for Applicant.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
INCOME TAX REFERENCE No 125 of 1988
For Approval and Signature:
Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE B.C.PATEL Sd/-
and
Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE D.A.MEHTA Sd/-
============================================================
1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO
to see the judgements?
2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO
3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO
of the judgement?
4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO
of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution
of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder?
5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? : NO --------------------------------------------------------------
SHRIKAM INDUSTRIES
Versus
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
--------------------------------------------------------------
Appearance:
MR MJ SHAH WITH MR JP SHAH for Applicant.
MR MANISH R BHATT for Respondent No. 1
--------------------------------------------------------------
CORAM : MR.JUSTICE B.C.PATEL
and
MR.JUSTICE D.A.MEHTA
Date of decision: 05/12/2001
ORAL JUDGEMENT
(Per : MR.JUSTICE D.A.MEHTA)
�At the time of hearing of this reference it has
been submitted by learned Advocate Shri Manish Shah
appearing for the applicant-assessee that he has been instructed by the assessee not to press the said reference. Thus, we leave the�question unanswered.
�The reference stands disposed of accordingly with
no order as to costs.
����Sd/-�Sd/-
���(B.C.Patel,J) (D.A.Mehta,J)
m.m.bhatt
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.