Shrikrishan P. Jindal Huf & Anr v. The Income Tax Officer & Ors
High Court
29 Jan 2008 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Shrikrishan P. Jindal Huf & Anr v. The Income Tax Officer & Ors
Date of order
29 Jan 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Shrikrishan P. Jindal Huf & Anr v. The Income Tax Officer & Ors, the High Court (2008) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
(-1-)
MGN
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL, CIVIL JURISDICTION
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL, CIVIL JURISDICTION
CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.21 OF 2008
IN
WRIT PETITION NO.2601 OF 2007
Shrikrishan P. Jindal HUF & Anr...Petitioners
Vs.
The Income Tax Officer & Ors. ..Respondents
Mr. J.D. Mistry with Mr. Jitendra Jain and Ricat
Chand i/b.D.S.K. Legal for the petitioners
Mr. P.S. Sahadevan for the Respondent.
CORAM: F.I.
R.S.MOHITE,JJ.
P.C.:
. Heard parties. Considering what is set out
in the Chamber Summons,Chamber Summons made absolute
in terms of prayer clause (a). Amendment to be
carried out in the course of the week.
(R.S.MOHITE, J.)
(R.S.MOHITE, J.)(F.I.REBELLO, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue