Shriram Chits Tamilnadu Pvt. Ltd v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax,Company Circle Vi (2),Chennai
High Court
17 Jun 2025 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court Β· hc_cis_mas
Parties
Shriram Chits Tamilnadu Pvt. Ltd v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax,Company Circle Vi (2),Chennai
Date of order
17 Jun 2025
Assessment year(s)
β
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Shriram Chits Tamilnadu Pvt. Ltd v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax,Company Circle Vi (2),Chennai, the High Court (2025) decided the matter.
Issue: 2) Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was correct in confirming the disallowance to the extent of Rs.5,13,800/- by applying Rule 8D read with Section 14A of the Act?β ____________ Page 2 of 5 2.
Decision: Appeals stand disposed of.
Summary auto-generated from the order below β read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order β as passed by the High Court
TCA Nos.530 of 2014 and 231 of 2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 17.06.2025
CORAM :
THE HON'BLE MR.K.R.SHRIRAM, CHIEF JUSTICE
AND
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN
T.C.A. Nos.530 of 2014 and 231 of 2012
Shriram Chits Tamilnadu Pvt. Ltd.,149, Greams Road,Chennai-600 006.PAN
.. Appellant in both appeals
Vs.
The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax,Company Circle VI (2),Chennai.
.. Respondent in both appeals
Prayer in TCA No.530 of 2014: Appeal filed under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against the order of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, βDβ Bench, Chennai, dated 27.11.2013 passed in I.T.A No.1688/Mds/2012.
Prayer in TCA No.231 of 2012: Appeal filed under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against the order of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, βDβ Bench, Chennai, dated 30.03.2012 passed in I.T.A No.1182/Mds/2011.
____________
Page 1 of 5
For Appellant:Mr.R.Sivaramanin both appeals
For Respondent:Mr.J.Narayanasamyin both appeals
COMMON JUDGMENT(Delivered by the Hon'ble Chief Justice)
The following two questions of law were framed on 28[th] August, 2012
and 28[th] October, 2014, respectively:
βT.C.A.No.530 of 2014:
1. Whether in law, the dividends received by the appellant as a chit subscriber, is exempt from taxation on grounds of mutuality between all the chit subscribers including the appellant?
2. Whether on the facts and circumstance of the case, the Tribunal was correct in confirming the disallowance to the extent of Rs.7,47,266/- by applying Rule 8D read with Section 14A of the Act?β
βT.C.A.No.231 of 2012:
1. Whether in law, the dividends received by the appellant as a chit subscriber, is exempt from taxation on grounds of mutuality between all the chit subscribers including the appellant?
2) Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was correct in confirming the disallowance to the extent of Rs.5,13,800/- by applying Rule 8D read with Section 14A of the Act?β
____________
Page 2 of 5
2. Shri Sivaraman, in fairness, states that the first question of law has
been answered against the assessee in Shriram Chits Tamilnadu (P) Ltd.,
No.149, Greams Road, Mount Road, Chennai-6 v. The ACIT, Income Tax Officer, Company Circle-VI(2), No.121, Nungambakkam High Road, Chennai-600 034[1].
3. As regards the second question of law, Shri Sivaraman states he does not wish to press the same. Shri Sivaraman states he will raise the issue in another proceedings, if need arises.
4. Appeals stand disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs.
(K.R.SHRIRAM, CJ.) (SUNDER MOHAN, J.)
17.06.2025
Index : Neutral Citationbbr
Yes/No:Yes/No
1 T.C.A.No.233 of 2011, decided on 28.11.2018
____________Page 3 of 5
To:
1. The Assistant Registrar Income Tax Appellate Tribunal βDβ Bench, Chennai. Income Tax Appellate Tribunal βDβ Bench, Chennai.
2. The Commissioner of Income Tax (A) V, Chennai. Chennai.
3. The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax,
Company Circle VI(2), Chennai. Chennai.
____________
Page 4 of 5
____________
Page 5 of 5
TCA Nos.530 of 2014 and 231 of 2012
THE HON'BLE CHIEF JUSTICE ANDSUNDER MOHAN,J.
bbr
TCA Nos.530 of 2014 and 231 of 2012
17.06.2025
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only β not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CAβclient relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.