Case LawHigh Court › Shriram Foundry Ltd, Kolhapur v. Deputy...

Shriram Foundry Ltd, Kolhapur v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle 2 And Ors

High Court 14 Mar 2012 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newas
Parties
Shriram Foundry Ltd, Kolhapur v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle 2 And Ors
Date of order
14 Mar 2012
Assessment year(s)
2005-06
Outcome
Allowed

Case summary

In Shriram Foundry Ltd, Kolhapur v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle 2 And Ors, the High Court (2012) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

The order — as passed by the High Court

srk IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.10959 OF 2011 Shriram Foundry Ltd,KolhapurVersus ...Petitioner Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax,Circle 2 and ors. ...Respondents Mr.Mihir C. Naniwadekar for petitioner.Mr.Vimal Gupta for respondent. CORAM: DR.D.Y. CHANDRACHUD & M.S.SANKLECHA, JJ. March 14, 2012. P.C. 1.Rule, returnable forthwith. Counsel appearing for the respondents waives service. By consent the petition is taken up for final hearing. 2.Leave to amend in terms of the draft amendment tendered, taken on record and marked “X” for identification. Amendment may be carried out forthwith. Verification dispensed with. 3. In these proceedings under Article 226 of the Constitution the petitioner has questioned the action of the Assessing Officer in reopening the assessment for Assessment Year 2005-06 by notice dated 7 March 2011. 4.Counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and the counsel appearing on behalf of the Revenue are agreed that the facts of the present case are similar to those in companion Writ Petition No.10957 of 2011 filed by the assessee which has been allowed by a judgment delivered today. 4A.For the reasons indicated by the Court while allowing companion petition, Rule is made absolute by setting aside the notice dated 7 March 2011 issued under Section 148, the order dated 9 December 2011 passed on the objections raised by the assessee and the order of assessment dated 30 December 2011. There shall be no order as to costs. (DR.D.Y. CHANDRACHUD,J.) (M.S.SANKLECHA, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan