Case LawHigh Court › Shri.shankar Ssk Ltd.solapur v. Dy.commi...

Shri.shankar Ssk Ltd.solapur v. Dy.commissioner Of Income-Tax

High Court 18 Jan 2005 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Shri.shankar Ssk Ltd.solapur v. Dy.commissioner Of Income-Tax
Date of order
18 Jan 2005
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Allowed

Case summary

In Shri.shankar Ssk Ltd.solapur v. Dy.commissioner Of Income-Tax, the High Court (2005) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Issue: By these Appeals the Appellants have sought to raise the substantial question of law as to whether non-refundable & refundable deposits can be treated as income of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.608 OF 2004 INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.608 OF 2004 Shri.Shankar SSK Ltd.Solapur .. Appellant V/s Dy.Commissioner of Income-tax, Spl.Rg.3, Solapur .. Respondent WITH INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.609 OF 2004 INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.609 OF 2004 Shri.Shankar SSK Ltd.Solapur .. Appellant V/s Dy.Commissioner of Income-tax, Spl.Rg.1, Kolhapur .. Respondent WITH INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.610 OF 2004 INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.610 OF 2004 INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.610 OF 2004 Sahakar Maharshi Shankarrao Mohite Patil SSK Ltd., Solapur .. Appellant V/s Dy.Commissioner of Income-tax, Spl.Rg.1, Kolhapur .. Respondent WITH INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.625 OF 2004 INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.625 OF 2004 Shri.Siddeshwar SSK Ltd., Solapur .. Appellant V/s Dy.Commissioner of Income-tax, Spl.Rg.3, Solapur .. Respondent WITH INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.629 OF 2004 INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.629 OF 2004 Shri.Shankar SSK Ltd., Solapur .. Appellant V/s Dy.Commissioner of Income-tax, Spl.Rg.3, Solapur .. Respondent WITH INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.630 OF 2004 INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.630 OF 2004 Shri.Shankar SSK Ltd., Solapur .. Appellant V/s Dy.Commissioner of Income-tax, Spl.Rg.1, Kolhapur .. Respondent WITH INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.631 OF 2004 INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.631 OF 2004 Shri.Siddeshwar SSK Ltd., Solapur .. Appellant V/s Dy.Commissioner of Income-tax, Spl.Rg.3, Solapur .. Respondent INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.632 OF 2004 INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.632 OF 2004 INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.632 OF 2004 Shri.Siddeshwar SSK Ltd., Solapur .. Appellant V/s Dy.Commissioner of Income-tax, Spl.Rg.3, Solapur .. Respondent WITH INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.688 OF 2004 INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.688 OF 2004 NIPHAD SSK Ltd., Nashik .. Appellant V/s Dy.Commissioner of Income-tax, Spl.Rg.1, Nashik .. Respondent ..... Mr.S.N.Inamdar with Mr.P.Vaidya for the Appellants in all Appeals. Mr.R.V.Desai (Sr.Counsel) with Ms.S.V.Bharucha & Mr.Pankaj Kapoor for the Respondents in all Appeals. CORAM: S.RADHAKRISHNAN & CORAM: S.RADHAKRISHNAN &J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. DATE : 18.01.2005. DATE : 18.01.2005. P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard the learned Counsel for the parties. By these Appeals the Appellants have sought to raise the substantial question of law as to whether non-refundable & refundable deposits can be treated as income of the assessee. On this issue, recently the Supreme Court in the case of Siddheshwar Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd.V/s Siddheshwar Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd.V/sCommissioner of Income Tax and Others - 270 ITR 1, has"non-refundable and refundabledeposits cannot be treated as income of theassessee-societies". In view thereof, all Appeals are Commissioner of Income Tax and Others - 270 ITR 1, clearly held that "non-refundable and refundable deposits cannot be treated as income of the assessee-societies" allowed, however, with no order as to costs. (S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan