Case LawHigh Court › Shri.v.k.ponnusamy v. The Assistant Comm...

Shri.v.k.ponnusamy v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax,Spl. Investigation Circle,Erode

High Court 21 Mar 2019 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
Shri.v.k.ponnusamy v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax,Spl. Investigation Circle,Erode
Date of order
21 Mar 2019
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Shri.v.k.ponnusamy v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax,Spl. Investigation Circle,Erode, the High Court (2019) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: JUSTICE C.V.KARTHIKEYAN,J arr J U D G M E N T (Judgment of the Court was delivered by DR.VINEET KOTHARI, J.) In view of the earlier endorsement made by the learned counsel for the Assessee Mr.M.P.Senthil Kumar on 07.08.2018, this Tax Case Appeal is dismissed as infructuous.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
1/2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 21.03.2019 CORAM: THE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE VINEET KOTHARI andTHE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.V.KARTHIKEYAN T.C.(A).No1017 of 2008 Shri.V.K.Ponnusamy,Prop. M/s.V.K.Ponnusamy Gounder & Sons,# 1/5, Sankari Main Road,Pallipalayam, Erode. .. Appellant ..Vs.. The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax,Spl. Investigation Circle,Erode. .. Respondent Prayer : Tax Case (Appeal) is filed under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, 'D' Bench, Chennai dated 11.01.2008 passed in I.T.(SS) A.NO.74/Mds/2006 for the Block Period 01.04.1986 to 20.02.1997. For Appellant For Respondent : Mr.M.P.Senthil Kumar: Mr.T.R.Senthil Kumar Senior Standing counsel 2/2 DR. JUSTICE VINEET KOTHARI,Jand MR. JUSTICE C.V.KARTHIKEYAN,J arr J U D G M E N T (Judgment of the Court was delivered by DR.VINEET KOTHARI, J.) In view of the earlier endorsement made by the learned counsel for the Assessee Mr.M.P.Senthil Kumar on 07.08.2018, this Tax Case Appeal is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. (V.K.,J.) (C.V.K.,J.) 21.03.2019 Index: Yes/NoInternet: Yes/Noarr To 1. The Deputy Registrar, Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Chennai 'D' Bench, Chennai. 2.Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), Salem. 3. Assistant Commissioner of Income-Tax, Special Investigation Circle, Erode. T.C.(A).No.1017 of 2008 http://www.judis.nic.in 3/2
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan